access icon free Periodic event/self-triggered consensus for general continuous-time linear multi-agent systems under general directed graphs

This study considers the decentralised periodic event-triggered consensus problem for continuous-time linear multi-agent systems (MASs) under general directed graphs. The authors discretise the continuous-time MASs based on zero-order hold, and propose an event-triggered consensus control (ETCC) algorithm rendering the states of agents reach consensus. They prove that under the proposed ETCC implemented in multiple steps, there is no Zeno-like behaviour exhibited in the sense of sampling. To relax the requirement of the periodic monitoring in the ETCC, it is further proposed a self-triggered consensus control algorithm, where the next triggering instant is predetermined by each agent at the previous triggering instant. For the case where the states of MASs are unavailable, the authors further propose an observer-based ETCC algorithm. Simulation results are given to illustrate the theoretical results.

Inspec keywords: directed graphs; sampled data systems; decentralised control; multivariable control systems; continuous time systems; linear systems; observers; periodic control; time-varying systems

Other keywords: Zeno-like behaviour; periodic monitoring; self-triggered consensus control algorithm; general directed graphs; observer-based ETCC algorithm; general continuous-time linear multiagent systems; agent state rendering; periodic self-triggered consensus control algorithm; zero-order hold; continuous-time linear MAS; ETCC algorithm; decentralised periodic event-triggered consensus problem

Subjects: Multivariable control systems; Discrete control systems; Combinatorial mathematics; Optimal control; Time-varying control systems; Simulation, modelling and identification; Linear control systems

References

    1. 1)
      • 10. Ren, W., Cao, Y.: ‘Convergence of sampled-data consensus algorithms for double-integrator dynamics’. Proc. of 47th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control (CDC, 2008), December 2008, pp. 39653970.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 9. Hayakawa, T., Matsuzawa, T., Hara, S.: ‘Formation control of multi-agent systems with sampled information’. Proc. of 45th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control (CDC, 2006), December 2006, pp. 43334338.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 28. Ren, W., Cao, Y.: ‘Distributed coordination of multi-agent networks: emergent problems, models, and issues’ (Springer-Verlag, London, 2011).
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 17. Dimarogonas, D., Johansson, K.: ‘Event-triggered control for multi-agent systems’. Proc. of Decision and Control (CDC), 2009 48th IEEE Conf. on, 2009, pp. 71317136.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 6. Zhao, Y., Duan, Z., Wen, G.: ‘Distributed finite-time tracking of multiple euler–lagrange systems without velocity measurements’, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, doi: 10.1002/rnc.3170, 2014, in press.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 2. Ren, W., Beard, R.: ‘Distributed consensus in multi-vehicle cooperative control: theory and applications’ (Springer, Berlin, 2008).
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
      • 20. Dimarogonas, D., Frazzoli, E., Johansson, K.: ‘Distributed self-triggered control for multi-agent systems’. Proc. of 49th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control (CDC, 2010), 2010, pp. 67166721.
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
      • 27. Chen, T., Francis, B.: ‘Optimal sampled-data control systems’ (Springer, 1995).
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2014.0612
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2014.0612
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading