Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Trust-region reflective adaptive controller for time varying systems

The new algorithm presented in this study, called TRAC (trust-region reflective adaptive controller), performs online adaptive control of time-varying linear or linearisable systems subject to parametric disturbances. The process of accomplishing such adaptive control consists of feeding the measured output signal back to TRAC – which occupies the outer loop of a control scheme – as well as the reference signal. Knowing the order of the closed-loop system in the inner loop, a parametric model of the time-varying output is derived as a function of the system's variables, such as damping and natural frequencies. Using trust-region optimisation, these parameters are estimated in real-time by recursively fitting the actual output into the parametric model. This allows for the location of the actual poles to be estimated in the s-domain after the poles have been shifted by the disturbance. Accordingly, the gains are re-tuned in order to return the actual poles to their desired location and absorb the disturbance. The primary advantage of TRAC relative to the state-of-the-art is its computational simplicity which is owed to search space restriction and heuristic approximations with trust-region search. A video of a sample application describing real-time TRAC-based control can be found on the IET's Digital Library.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 1. Nise, N.: ‘Control systems engineering’ (Wiley, 2010, 6th edn.), Ch. 1–2.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 28. Moubarak, P.: TRAC application to model-predictive adaptive control of a third order system with a PI controller and full state feedback: http://youtu.be/DPHzyolOnpw, Retrieved December 2013.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 22. Guzman, E., Moreno, J.: ‘A new finite-time convergent and robust direct model reference adaptive control for SISO linear time invariant systems’. Proc. 50th Int. Conf. on Decision and Control and European Control Conf. (CDC-ECC), Orlando, Florida, 2011, pp. 70277032.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • 19. Madonski, R., Przybyla, M., Kordasz, M., Herman, P.: ‘Application of active disturbance rejection control to a reel-to-reel system seen in tire industry’. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Automation Science and Engineering, CASE’11, Trieste, Italy, 2011, pp. 274278.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • 32. Ugray, Z., Lasdon, L., Plummer, J.C., Glover, F., Kelly, J., Martí, R.: ‘Scatter search and local NLP solvers: a multistart framework for global optimization’, J. Comput., 2007, 19, (3), pp. 328340.
    19. 19)
      • 23. Hoagg, J.: ‘Multi-input multi-output direct model reference adaptive control for systems with known nonminimum-phase zeros’. Proc. 2012 American Control Conf. ACC’12, Montral, Canada, 2012, pp. 338343.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 4. Moubarak, P., Alvarez, E., Ben-Tzvi, P.: ‘Reconfiguring a modular robot into a humanoid formation: a multi-body dynamic perspective on motion scheduling for modules and their formations’. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Automation Science and Engineering, CASE‘13, Madison, WI, 2013, pp. 687692.
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
      • 7. Landau, I., Lozano, R., M’Saad, M., Karimi, A.: ‘Adaptive control: algorithms, analysis and applications’, (Springer, 2011, 2nd edn.), Ch. 1.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2014.0380
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2014.0380
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address