Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Robustness analysis of input shaping commands for two-mode flexible systems

Robustness analysis of input shaping commands for two-mode flexible systems

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Control Theory & Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

A robustness evaluation of input-shaping techniques to reduce residual vibration of two-mode flexible systems is presented. Using a benchmark two-mode system, the robustness problem is illustrated by first applying input shapers designed for only one mode. These simple shapers are effective for a wide array of two-mode systems because the amplitude of the second mode is often small, perhaps near the noise level. However, single-mode shapers are ineffective when the second mode contributes substantial oscillation amplitude. Therefore the robustness analysis for both single- and two-mode input shapers reveals an inherent compromise between shaper robustness to parameter uncertainties and rise time of the command. A specified-insensitivity shaper can result in command profiles that are significantly more robust to modelling errors than profiles produced with alternative input shapers. The robustness evaluation is verified with a numerical simulation of double-pendulum dynamics and experimentally validated on a 10 ton industrial bridge crane.

References

    1. 1)
      • Wie, B., Sinha, R., Sunkel, J., Cox, K.: `Robust fuel- and time-optimal control of uncertain flexible space structures', Proc. Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conf., 1993, Monterey, CA, p. 939–948, AIAA.
    2. 2)
      • G.H. Tallman , O.J.M. Smith . Analog study of dead-beat posicast control. IRE Trans. Autom. Control , 14 - 21
    3. 3)
      • Kenison, M., Singhose, W.: `Input shaper design for double-pendulum planar gantry cranes', IEEE Conf. Control Applications, 1999, Hawaii, p. 539–544.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • R. Blevins . (1979) Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • Y.-G. Sung , W. Singhose . Closed-form specified-fuel commands for two-mode systems. J. Guid., Control Dyn. , 6 , 1590 - 1596
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • W. Singhose , D. Kim , M. Kenison . Input shaping control of double-pendulum bridge crane oscillations. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control , 3
    11. 11)
      • Tuttle, T.: `Creating time-optimal commands for linear systems', 1997, PhD, M.I.T.
    12. 12)
      • J. Van De Vegte . (1986) Feedback control systems.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • Singhose, W., Seering, W., Singer, N.: `Input shaping for vibration reduction with specified insensitivity to modleing errors', Japan-USA Symp. Flexible Automation, 1996, Boston, MA, 1, p. 307–313.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2007.0328
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2007.0328
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address