Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess Remote health care cyber-physical system: quality of service (QoS) challenges and opportunities

There is a growing emphasis to find alternative non-traditional ways to manage patients to ease the burden on health care services largely fuelled by a growing demand from sections of population that is ageing. In-home remote patient monitoring applications harnessing technological advancements in the area of Internet of things (IoT), semantic web, data analytics, and cloud computing have emerged as viable alternatives. However, such applications generate large amounts of real-time data in terms of volume, velocity, and variety thus making it a big data problem. Hence, the challenge is how to combine and analyse such data with historical patient data to obtain meaningful diagnoses suggestions within acceptable time frames (considering quality of service (QoS)). Despite the evolution of big data processing technologies (e.g. Hadoop) and scalable infrastructure (e.g. clouds), there remains a significant gap in the areas of heterogeneous data collection, real-time patient monitoring, and automated decision support (semantic reasoning) based on well-defined QoS constraints. In this study, the authors review the state-of-the-art in enabling QoS for remote health care applications. In particular, they investigate the QoS challenges required to meet the analysis and inferencing needs of such applications and to overcome the limitations of existing big data processing tools.

References

    1. 1)
      • 16. Kang, Y.B., Li, Y.F., Krishnaswamy, S.: Int. Semantic Web Conf., 2012, pp. 198214.
    2. 2)
      • 3. Bengtsson, T.: ‘Population ageing – a threat to the welfare state?: the case of Sweden’ (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2010).
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 39. Mitra, K., Saguna, S., Åhlund, C.: ‘M 2 C 2: A mobility management system for mobile cloud computing’. 2015 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf. (WCNC), 2015, pp. 16081613.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 40. Khoi, N.M., Saguna, S., Mitra, K., et al: ‘IReHMo: An efficient IoT-based remote health monitoring system for smart regions’. 2015 17th Int. Conf. on E-health Networking, Application & Services (HealthCom), 2015, pp. 563568.
    9. 9)
      • 41. Leitner, P., Cito, J.: arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.2429, 2014.
    10. 10)
      • 15. Kang, Y.B., Pan, J.Z., Krishnaswamy, S., et al: Aaai, 2014, pp. 8086.
    11. 11)
      • 21. Shvachko, K., Kuang, H., Radia, S., et al: ‘The hadoop distributed file system’. 2010 IEEE 26th Symp. on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST), 2010, pp. 110.
    12. 12)
      • 9. McKay, L.I., Cidlowski, J.A.:Corticosteroids in the treatment of neoplasms, (BC Decker)’, 2003.
    13. 13)
      • 31. Nef, M.A., Perlepes, L., Karagiorgou, S., et al: ‘Enabling qos in the internet of things’. Proc. of the Fifth Int. Conf. on Communications, Theory, Reliability, and Quality of Service (CTRQ 2012), 2012, pp. 3338.
    14. 14)
      • 24. Grau, B.C., Halaschek-Wiener, C., Kazakov, Y.: ‘History matters: Incremental ontology reasoning using modules’. The Semantic Web, 2007, pp. 183196.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • 19. Urbani, J., Kotoulas, S., Oren, E., et al: Int. Semantic Web Conf., 2009, pp. 634649.
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 7. Young, D.J., Salzman, G.A.: ‘Status Asthmaticus in adult patients’, Hosp. Phys., 2006, 42, (11), p. 13.
    21. 21)
      • 32. Davenport, T., Redman, T.: ‘Build data quality into the internet of things’, Wall Str. J., 2015.
    22. 22)
      • 1. Bureau, P.R.: ‘World population data sheet’, 2015.
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
      • 22. Schlicht, A., Stuckenschmidt, H.: ‘MapResolve’. Int. Conf. on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems, 2011, pp. 294299.
    26. 26)
      • 13. Golbreich, C., Wallace, E.K.: ‘W3C recommendation’, 2012.
    27. 27)
      • 26. George, L.: ‘HBase: the definitive guide’ (O'Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, 2011).
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • 35. Alhamazani, K., Ranjan, R., Jayaraman, P.P., et al: 2015.
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 4. Gartner, U.M.: ‘Gartner's 2014 hype cycle for emerging technologies maps the journey to digital business’, 2014.
    32. 32)
      • 28. Duan, R., Chen, X., Xing, T.: ‘A QoS architecture for IOT, Internet of Things (iThings/CPSCom)’. 2011 Int. Conf. on and Fourth Int. Conf. on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, 2011, pp. 717720.
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
    35. 35)
      • 12. W.W.W.W. Consortium, et al: ‘OWL web ontology language current status-w3c’.
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
    38. 38)
      • 27. Sequeda, D.J.: ‘Introduction to: triplestores’.
    39. 39)
      • 42. Hwang, C.L., Masud, A.S.M.: ‘Multiple objective decision making – methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey’ (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012), vol. 164.
    40. 40)
      • 2. E.C. OECD Health Policy Studies: ‘United kingdom – a good life in old age? monitoring and improving quality in long-term care’, 2013.
    41. 41)
      • 30. Jin, J., Gubbi, J., Luo, T., et al: Network architecture and QoS issues in the internet of things for a smart city, 2012 Int. Symp. on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT), 2012, pp. 956961.
    42. 42)
    43. 43)
    44. 44)
      • 29. Awan, I., Younas, M.: ‘Towards QoS in internet of things for delay sensitive information’. Int. Conf. on Mobile Web and Information Systems, 2013, pp. 8694.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cps.2016.0023
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cps.2016.0023
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address