Required SNR improvement for downlink optical communication via channel coding and aperture diversity by utilising PPM

Required SNR improvement for downlink optical communication via channel coding and aperture diversity by utilising PPM

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In this study, it is aimed to investigate the required signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that provides a sufficient bit error rate (BER) according to the zenith angle between the ground station and satellite when pulse position modulation is utilised. Many parameters such as scintillation index, link distance, wavelength, Rytov variance, Fried's parameter, aperture diameter of the receiver and zenith angle have been considered to achieve realistic results. Due to the restrictions on the system, some parameters are specified as deterministic; the obtained results suggest that the required SNR value changes in a wide range from small to large values of the zenith angle to achieve sufficient BER. Therefore, either SNR adjustment as a function of the zenith angle is provided or the interval of the zenith angles to establish the link is determined previously in order to avoid the high link margin. It is shown that, instead of the second choice, aperture diversity is utilised at the receiver to establish communication even for large zenith angles with a reasonable value of the SNR. Besides aperture diversity, channel coding with error correction codes further improves the performance.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Ghassemlooy, Z., Papoola, W., Rajbhandari, S.: ‘Optical wireless communications: systems and channel modeling with matlab’ (CRC Press, Florida, 2013).
    2. 2)
      • 2. Kaushal, H., Kaddoum, G.: ‘Optical communication in space: challenges and mitigation techniques’, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 2017, 19, (1), pp. 5796.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Hemmati, H.: ‘Near-earth laser communications’ (CRC Press, Florida, 2009).
    4. 4)
      • 4. Andrews, L.C., Hopen, C.Y., Al-Habash, M.A.: ‘Fade statistics associated with a space/ground laser communication link at large zenith angles’. Proc. SPIE Conf. on Propagation and Imaging through the Atmosphere III, Denver, Colorado, USA, 1999.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Andrews, L.C., Phillips, R.L.: ‘Laser beam propagation through random media’ (SPIE Press, Washington, 2005, 2nd edn.).
    6. 6)
      • 6. Majumdar, A.K.: ‘Advanced free-space optics: a system approach’ (Springer Science, 2015).
    7. 7)
      • 7. Djordjevic, I., Ryan, W., Wasic, B.: ‘Coding for optical channels’ (Springer Science, 2010).
    8. 8)
      • 8. Dimitrov, S., Matuz, B., Liva, G., et al: ‘Digital modulation and coding for satellite optical feeder links’. Proc. 7th Advanced Satellite Multimedia Conf. and 13th Signal Processing for Space Communications Workshop (ASMS/SPSC), Livorno, Italy, 2014.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Tsiftsis, T.A., Sandalidis, H.G., Karagiannidis, G.K., et al: ‘Optical wireless links with spatial diversity over strong atmospheric turbulence channels’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2009, 8, (2), pp. 951957.
    10. 10)
      • 10. de Oliveira, J.P.G.: ‘Statistical characteristics of free-space optical systems employing reception spatial diversity’,Proc. SPIE,2014,9224, pp. 922418-1922418-16.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Navidpoor, S.M., Uysal, M., Kavehrad, M.: ‘BER performance of free-space optical transmission with spatial diversity’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2007, 6, (8), pp. 28132819.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Lyu, W., Cong, B., Han, J., et al: ‘OFDM and self-coherent detection based satellite-to-ground communication system’. Proc. 15th Int. Conf. on Optical Commun. and Networks (ICOCN), Hangzhou, China, 2016.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Liao, H., Ma, J.: ‘Performance evaluation of channel coding and aperture averaging for the satellite-to-ground optical communications with APD receivers’. Proc. 6th Int. ICST Conf. on Commun. Networking in China (CHINACOM), Harbin, China, 2011.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Gopal, P., Jain, V.K., Kar, S.: ‘Modulation techniques used in earth-to-satellite and inter-satellite free space optical links’, Proc. SPIE, 2014, 9248, pp. 92480V-192480V-10.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Tiwari, S., Jain, V.K., Kar, S.: ‘Performance evaluation of different pulse position modulation schemes in atmospheric turbulence channel for ground-to-satellite optical communication’. Int. Conf. Optical Engineering (ICOE), Belgaum, Karnataka, India, 2012.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Viswanath, A., Jain, V.K., Kar, S.: ‘Performance evaluation of satellite-to-earth FSO link in presence of turbulence and weather conditions for different IM schemes’. Proc. 22nd National Conf. on Communication, Assam, India, 2016.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Li, K., Ma, J., Belmonte, A., et al: ‘Performance analysis of satellite-to-ground downlink optical communications with spatial diversity over Gamma–Gamma atmospheric turbulence’, Appl. Opt. Opt. Eng., 2015, 54, (12), pp. 126103-1–126103-9.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Gappmair, W., Flohberger, M.: ‘Error Performance of coded FSO links in turbulent atmosphere modeled by gamma–gamma distributions’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2009, 8, (5), pp. 22092213.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Djordjevic, I.B.: ‘LDPC-coded MIMO optical communication over the atmospheric turbulence channel using Q-ary pulse position modulation’, Opt. Exp., 2007, 15, (16), pp. 1002610032.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Djordjevic, I.B., Denic, S., Anguita, J., et al: ‘LDPC-coded MIMO optical communication over the atmospheric turbulence channel’, J. Lightwave Technol., 2008, 26, (5), pp. 478487.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Uysal, M., Li, J., Yu, M.: ‘Error rate performance analysis of coded free-space optical links over gamma-gamma atmospheric turbulence channels’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2006, 5, (6), pp. 12291233.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Chochol, M., Rissons, A., Lacan, J., et al: ‘Evaluation of error correcting code performances of a free space optical communication system between LEO satellite and ground station’, Proc. SPIE, 2015, 9647, pp. 96470K-196470K-9.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Şahin, S.: ‘Improvement of required SNR for satellite-to-ground optical communication via aperture diversity by using PPM’. Int. Symp. on Comm. Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing, Prague, Czech Republic, 2016.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Majumdar, A.K., Ricklin, J.C.: ‘Free-space laser communications: principles and advances’ (Springer Science+Business Media, 2008).
    25. 25)
      • 25. European Telecommunications Standards Institute: ‘Digital video broadcasting (DVB); second generation framing structure, channel coding and modulation systems for broadcasting, interactive services, news gathering and other broadband satellite applications’. EN 302 307 v1.1.2, 2006.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Chung, S.-Y., Forney, G.D.Jr., Richardson, T.J., Urbanke, R.: ‘On the design of low-density parity-check codes within 0.0045 dB of the Shannon limit’, IEEE Commun. Lett., 2001, 5, (2), pp. 5860.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Hu, X.Y., Eleftheriou, E., Arnold, D.M., et al: ‘Efficient implementations of the sum-product algorithm for decoding LDPC codes’. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conf., vol. 2, 2001, p. 1036.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address