access icon free Secrecy performance analysis with relay selection methods under impact of co-channel interference

In this study, the authors evaluate secrecy performance of cooperative protocols with relay selection methods under impact of co-channel interference. In particular, the authors propose an optimal selection scheme to maximise the secrecy capacity obtained at the cooperative phase. In addition, the authors also consider suboptimal and random selection schemes which reduce the complexity of implementation, when compared with the optimal one. For performance evaluation, the authors derive exact and asymptotic closed-form expressions of secrecy outage probability and probability of non-zero secrecy capacity for the considered schemes over Rayleigh fading channels. Monte Carlo simulations are performed to validate the derivations.

Inspec keywords: protocols; Monte Carlo methods; Rayleigh channels; telecommunication security; probability; cochannel interference

Other keywords: secrecy outage probability; Monte Carlo simulations; cooperative protocols; performance evaluation; secrecy capacity; Rayleigh fading channels; asymptotic closed-form expressions; secrecy performance analysis; relay selection methods; co-channel interference

Subjects: Other topics in statistics; Monte Carlo methods; Electromagnetic compatibility and interference; Radio links and equipment

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 29. Gradshteyn, I.S., Ryzhik, I.M.: ‘Table of integrals, series, and products’ (Academic Press, 2007, 7th edn.).
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 15. Duong, T.Q., Duy, T.T., Elkashlan, M., Tran, N.H., Dobre, O.A.: ‘Secured cooperative cognitive radio networks with relay selection’. IEEE Global Communications Conf., Austin, TX USA, December 2014, pp. 30743079.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 9. Ikki, S.S., Ahmed, M.H.: ‘On the performance of adaptive decode-and-forward cooperative diversity with the nth best-relay selection scheme’. Proc. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conf., Honolulu, HI, 2009, pp. 16.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 28. Proakis, J.G.: ‘Digital communications’ (Mc Graw Hill, 2000, 4th edn.).
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2014.1128
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2014.1128
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading