Print ISSN 1751-8628"/>
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Energy and cost impacts of relay and femtocell deployments in long-term-evolution advanced

Buy article PDF
$19.95
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00

Abstract

In long-term-evolution-advanced (LTE-advanced), heterogeneous deployments of relays, femtocells and conventional macrocells are expected to provide coverage extension and throughput enhancement, while significantly lowering the energy consumption and total-cost-of-ownership (TCO) in cellular networks. This study presents a methodology for estimating the total energy consumption, taking into account the total operational power and embodied energy, and TCO of wireless cellular networks, and in particular provides a means to compare homogeneous and heterogeneous network (HetNets) deployments. The authors introduce realistic energy models and energy metrics based on information available from mobile-network operators (MNOs) and base stations manufacturers. Additionally, up-to-date operational and capital expenditure (OPEX and CAPEX) models are used to calculate TCO of candidate networks. The authors evaluate two scenarios for HetNets, namely a joint macro-relay network and a joint macro–femtocell network, with different relay and femtocell deployments densities. The results obtained show that compared to macro-centric networks, joint macro-relay networks are both energy and cost efficient, whereas joint macro–femtocell networks reduce the networks TCO at the expense of increased energy-consumption. Finally, it is observed that energy and cost gains are highly sensitive to the OPEX model adopted.

References

    1. 1)
      • Femtocells – natural solution for offload, a femto forum topic brief, Published by the Femto Forum June 2010, http://www.femtoforum.org/femto/, accessed July 2011.
    2. 2)
      • Cisco visual networking index: global mobile data traffic forecast update. 2009–2014, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_paper_c11-520862.html, accessed July 2011.
    3. 3)
      • CTIA Semi-Annual Wireless Industry Survey, Year-End 2010 top-line survey results, http://www.ctia.org/advocacy/research/index.cfm/AID/10316, accessed July 2011.
    4. 4)
      • G. Auer , I. Godor , L. Hevizi . (2010) The EARTH project: towards energy efficient wireless networks.
    5. 5)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    6. 6)
      • 3GPP TR 36.814 V2.0.0: ‘Further advancements for E-UTRA physical layer aspects’, March 2010.
    7. 7)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    8. 8)
      • S. Saunders , S. Carlaw , A. Giustina . (2009) Femtocells: opportunities and challenges for business and technology.
    9. 9)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    10. 10)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    11. 11)
      • Beniero, T., Redana, S., Hämäläinen, J., Raaf, B.: `Effect of relaying on coverage in 3GPP LTE-advanced', Proc. IEEE VTC-Spring Conf., April 2009, Barcelona, Spain.
    12. 12)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    13. 13)
      • Lang, E., Redana, S., Raff, B.: `Business impact of relay deployment for coverage extension in 3GPP LTE-advanced', Proc. IEEE ICC Conf., June 2009, Dresden, Germany.
    14. 14)
      • The Green Radio Project Core 5, www.mobilevce.com, accessed July 2011.
    15. 15)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    16. 16)
      • In-Stat, mobile communications 2008: green thinking beyond TCO consideration, http://www.instat.com.cn/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/green-mobile-network-whitepaper-2008.pdf, accessed July 2011.
    17. 17)
      • Consultant value added: ‘Mobile operators are spending three times more on opex than on capital expenditure’, Published online – 22 June 2008, http://consultantvalueadded.com/2008/06/22/mobile-operators-are-spending-three-times-more-on-opex-than-on-capital-expenditure/, accessed July 2011.
    18. 18)
      • Saleh, B.A., Redana, S., Raff, B., Hämäläinen, J.: `Comparison of relay and pico eNB deployments in LTE-advanced', Proc. IEEE VTC-Fall Conf., Anchorage, September 2009, Alaska, USA.
    19. 19)
      • Werner, M., Moberg, P., Skillermark, P.: `Cost assessment and optimization methods for multi-node radio access networks', Proc. IEEE VTC-Spring Conf., May 2008, Marina Bay, Singapore.
    20. 20)
      • Claussen, H., Calin, D.: `Macrocell offloading benefits in joint macro-and femtocell deployments', Proc. IEEE PIMRC Conf., September 2009, Tokyo, Japan.
    21. 21)
      • Claussen, H., Ho, W.T.L., Pivit, F.: `Effects of joint macrocell and residential picocell deployment on the network energy efficiency', Proc. IEEE PIMRC Conf., September 2008, Alaska, USA.
    22. 22)
      • Hou, Y., Laurenson, D.: `Energy efficiency of high QoS heterogeneous wireless communication network', Proc. IEEE VTC-Fall Conf., September 2010, Ottawa, Canada.
    23. 23)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    24. 24)
      • Arnold, O., Richter, F., Fettweis, G., Blume, O.: `Power consumption modeling of different base station types in heterogeneous cellular networks', Proc. ICT Mobile Summit, June 2010, Florence, Italy.
    25. 25)
      • EARTH project deliverable, D2.3: ‘Energy efficiency analysis of the reference systems, areas of improvements and target breakdown’, 31 December 2010.
    26. 26)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    27. 27)
      • Ofcom, mobile phone base-station database, http://www.sitefinder.ofcom.org.uk/, accessed July 2011.
    28. 28)
      • M. Dohler , Y. Li . (2010) Cooperative communications: hardware, channel and PHY.
    29. 29)
      • ThinkFemtocell: ‘Dual-mode HSPA/LTE femtocell chipset (Feynman)’. http://www.thinkfemtocell.com/System/70-dual-mode-hspalte-femtocell-by-2011.html, accessed July 2011.
    30. 30)
      • ThinkFemtocell: ‘Femtocell leadership interview with Shlomo Gadot Percello’. http://www.thinkfemtocell.com/Femtocell-Interview/femtocell-leadership-interview-with-shlomo-gadot-percello.html, accessed July 2011.
    31. 31)
      • NEC: ‘NEC FP810 femtocell: tiny but 14.4/5.7Mbps data rates’. http://www.slashgear.com/nec-fp810-femtocell-tiny-but-14-45-7mbps-data-rates-1073529/, accessed July 2011.
    32. 32)
      • Microwave Engineering Europe: ‘PicoChip-PC7300: Low power femtocell design significantly reduces cost’. http://www.mwee.com/en/low-power-femtocell-design-significantly-reduces-cost.html?cmp_id=7&news_id=222901052&vID=44, accessed July 2011.
    33. 33)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    34. 34)
      • European Code of Conduct on Energy Consumption of Broadband Equipment, Ver. 3, November 2008.
    35. 35)
      • , : `Overview to LTE energy saving solutions to cell switch off/on', 3GPP RAN3 Meeting, Janurary 2010, Valencia, Spain, 3GPP R3–100162.
    36. 36)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    37. 37)
      • 1 onward link is available for this reference.
      • CrossRef
    38. 38)
      • Edler, T.: `Green base stations – how to minimize CO2 emission in operator networks', Ericsson Seminar, Bath Base Station Conf., 2008.
    39. 39)
      • Louhi, T.J., Scheck, H.O.: `Energy efficiency of cellular networks', Proc. IEEE WPMC Conf., September 2008, Lapland, Finland.
    40. 40)
      • ThinkFemtocell: ‘Interview with picoChip CTO – D. Pulley’. http://www.thinkfemtocell.com/Femtocell-Interview/doug-pulley-picochip-cto.html, accessed July 2011.

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2011.0111
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address