access icon free Reverse conducting–IGBTs initial snapback phenomenon and its analytical modelling

Analytical models have been proposed to describe the onset current density for the initial snapback in the transistor on-state mode and in the blocking state of reverse conducting-insulated gate bipolar transistors (RC-IGBT) for the stripe and cylindrical designs of the anode shorts. In cylindrical case, there are two possible ways in designing the anode shorts and the authors have proposed an analytical model for each of them. The considered RC-IGBTs are vertical with soft punch-through type buffer designs. The analytical model has been evaluated with the aid of 2-D device simulations and measurements. The authors have investigated the initial snapback phenomenon for different voltage class devices at a given technology (anode and buffer profiles) and found out that the snapback voltage increases with the blocking capability but not the snapback current density. The authors have also observed that the initial snapback phenomenon is more pronounced at lower temperatures. From the analytical model as well as simulation and measurement results, the authors have found that for a given voltage class and technology, the p+-anode width is the only remaining design degree of freedom which determines the initial snapback. The adjustment of the on-state losses can then be done with the proportion of the n+-short region.

Inspec keywords: current density; insulated gate bipolar transistors; semiconductor device models

Other keywords: on-state losses; blocking state; anode profiles; buffer profiles; onset current density; blocking capability; snapback voltage; snapback current density; p+-anode width; soft punch-through type buffer designs; transistor on-state mode; n+-short region; initial snapback phenomenon; anode shorts; reverse conducting-IGBT; cylindrical case; 2D device simulations; RC-IGBT

Subjects: Insulated gate field effect transistors; Bipolar transistors; Semiconductor device modelling, equivalent circuits, design and testing

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • 5. Antoniou, M., Udrea, F., Bauer, F., Nistor, I.: ‘A new way to alleviate the RC IGBT snapback phenomenon: The SuperJunction Solution’. Proc. ISPSD'10, Hiroshima, 2010, pp. 153156.
    3. 3)
      • 17. Storasta, L., Kopta, A., Rahimo, M.: ‘A comparison of charge dynamics in the reverse-conducting RC IGBT and bi-mode insulated gate transistor BiGT’. Proc. ISPSD, Hiroshima, 2010, pp. 391394.
    4. 4)
      • 16. Griebl, E., Lorenz, L., Puirschel, M.: ‘LightMOS a new power semiconductor concept dedicated for lamp ballast application’. IAS annual meeting, 2003, pp. 768772.
    5. 5)
      • 19. Chen, W., Li, Z., Ren, M., et al: ‘A high reliable reverse-conducting IGBT with a floating P-plug’. Proc. ISPSD, Kanazawa, 2013, pp. 265268.
    6. 6)
      • 8. Rüthing, H., Hille, F., Niedernostheide, F.-J., Schulze, H.-J., Brunner, B.: ‘600 V reverse conducting (RC-)IGBT for drives applications in ultra-thin wafer technology’. Proc. ISPSD, Jeju, 2007, pp. 8992.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 2. Voss, S., Hellmund, O., Frank, W.: ‘New IGBT concepts for consumer power applications’. IAS annual meeting, New Orleans, 2007, pp. 10381043.
    9. 9)
      • 10. Wigger, D., Eckel, H.-G.: ‘Comparison of the power cycling stress between IGBT and BIGT inverters’. Proc. PCIM'10, Nürnberg, 2010, pp. 338343.
    10. 10)
      • 9. Eckel, H.-G.: ‘Potential of reverse conducting IGBTs in voltage source inverters’. Proc. PCIM, Nürnberg, 2009, pp. 334339.
    11. 11)
      • 4. Kimmer, T., Oehmen, J., Türkes, P., Voss, S.: ‘Reverse conducting IGBT – a new technology to increase the energy efficiency of induction cookers’. Proc. PESC, Rhodes, 2008, pp. 22842287.
    12. 12)
      • 6. Kumar, D., Sweet, M., Vershinin, K., Ngwendson, L., Narayanan, E.M.S.: ‘RC-TCIGBT: A reverse conducting trench clustered IGBT’. Proc. ISPSD, Jeju, 2007, pp. 161164.
    13. 13)
      • 14. Storasta, L., Rahimo, M., Bellini, M., Kopta, A., Vemulapati, U.R., Kaminski, N.: ‘The radial layout design concept for the bi-mode insulated gate transistor’. Proc. ISPSD, San Diego, 2011, pp. 5659.
    14. 14)
      • 1. Takahashi, H., Yamamoto, A., Aono, S., Minato, T.: ‘1200 V reverse conducting IGBT’. Proc. ISPSD, Kitakyushu, 2004, pp. 133136.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • 18. Akiyama, H., Minato, T., Harada, M., Pan, H., Kondoh, H., Akasaka, Y.: ‘Effects of shorted collector on characteristics of IGBTs’. Proc. ISPSD, Tokyo, 1990, pp. 131136.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • 3. Rahimo, M., Schlapbach, U., Kopta, A., Vobecky, J., Schneider, D., Baschnagel, A.: ‘A high current 3300 V module employing reverse conducting IGBTs setting a new benchmark in output power capability’. Proc. ISPSD, Oralando, 2008, pp. 6871.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cds.2013.0222
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cds.2013.0222
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading