Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free BioHDD: a dataset for studying biometric identification on heavily degraded data

Substantial efforts have been put into bridging the gap between biometrics and visual surveillance, in order to develop automata able to recognise human beings ‘in the wild’. This study focuses on biometric recognition in extremely degraded data, and its main contributions are three-fold: (1) announce the availability of an annotated dataset that contains high quality mugshots of 101 subjects, and large sets of probes degraded extremely by 10 different noise factors; (2) report the results of a mimicked watchlist identification scheme: an online survey was conducted, where participants were asked to perform positive and negative identification of probes against the enrolled identities. Along with their answers, volunteers had to provide the major reasons that sustained their responses, which enabled the authors to perceive the kind of features that are most frequently associated with successful/failed human identification processes. As main conclusions, the authors observed that humans rely greatly on shape information and holistic features. Otherwise, colour and texture-based features are almost disregarded by humans; (3) finally, the authors give evidence that the positive human identification on such extremely degraded data might be unreliable, whereas negative identification might constitute an interesting alternative for such cases.

References

    1. 1)
      • 1. Jain, A.K., Pankanti, S., Prabhakar, S., Hong, L., Ross, A.: ‘Biometrics: a grand challenge’. Proc. 17th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2004, vol. 2, pp. 935942.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 3. Matey, J.R., Naroditsky, O., Hanna, K., et al: ‘Iris on the move: acquisition of images for iris recognition in less constrained environments’. Proc. IEEE, 2006, vol. 94, pp. 19361947.
    6. 6)
      • 9. Gross, R.: ‘Face databases’ (Springer Verlag, 2005).
    7. 7)
      • 13. Gross, R., Matthews, I., Cohn, J., Kanade, T., Baker, S.: ‘Multi-pie’. FG ‘08. Eighth IEEE Int. Conf. on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition, September 2008, pp. 18.
    8. 8)
      • 16. Yager, N., Dunstone, T.: ‘Worms, chameleons, phantoms and doves: new additions to the biometric menagerie’. IEEE Workshop on Automatic Identification Advanced Technologies, 2007, pp. 16.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 15. Matthews, B.W.: ‘Comparison of the predicted and the observed secondary structure of t4 phage lysozyme’, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1975, 405, pp. 442451.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 12. Gao, W., Cao, B., Shan, S., Zhou, D., Zhang, X., Zhao, D.: ‘The cas-peal large-scale chinese face database and baseline evaluations’.Technical Report JDL-TR-04-FR-001, ICT-ISVISION, Chinese Academy of Sciences, May 2004.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 14. Huang, G.B., Ramesh, M., Berg, T., Learned-Miller, E.: ‘Labeled faces in the wild: a database for studying face recognition in unconstrained environments’.Technical Report 07-49, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, October 2007.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-bmt.2014.0045
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-bmt.2014.0045
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address