Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Performance assessments of iris recognition in tactical biometric devices

Tactical biometric devices are used to establish the identity of individuals of interest in various military and law-enforcement scenarios. Most testing of these devices has been conducted in laboratory settings rather than in operationally-realistic tactical scenarios. This study describes an experiment which can viably replace this paradigm by measuring the performance of handheld biometric devices in a variety of tactical environments. The experimental procedure assessed the collectability, quality and matchability of images collected in operationally-realistic scenarios. Iris recognition accuracy was measured using several commercial algorithms. Results illustrate performance degradation in operational results relative to laboratory results; the collection limitations of the devices in operationally-realistic settings; and the effects of operators, subjects, devices and environments on performance. The authors believe that this experiment is unique in its exploration of these elements and that the powerful results presented suggest a need for refinement of design and procurement criteria.

References

    1. 1)
      • 4. Anderson, M., Whitcomb, P.: ‘DOE simplified: practical tools for effective experimentation’ (Productivity, Inc, Portland, 2000).
    2. 2)
      • 6. Cross Match Technologies, Inc. Crossmatch. 2.8.22.0.
    3. 3)
      • 7. Daugman, J.: Daugman 10. v8.7 Rev 1.9.
    4. 4)
      • 3. Faddis, K., Matey, J.R., Stracener, J.: ‘Tactical biometric devices: establishing operational test & evaluation techniques to improve design & performance’, J. Int. Test Eval. Assoc. (ITEA), 2013, 34, pp. 2131.
    5. 5)
      • 1. National Science and Technology Council, Subcommittee On Biometrics and Identity Management. Biometrics.gov Introduction to biometrics. [homepage on the Internet]. 2006 Available at http://www.biometrics.gov/Documents/Glossary.pdf.
    6. 6)
      • 9. Stat-Ease, Inc. Design-Ease. Version 8.0.5. 2011.
    7. 7)
      • 14. 3M. Cogent. v2.5.0.3 Rev 1.0.
    8. 8)
      • 12. Fenker, S.P., Bowyer, K.W.: Experimental evidence of a template aging effect in iris biometrics. IEEE Computer Socirty Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision 2011. 9. ISO/IEC FDIS 19795-6 Biometric performance testing and reporting – Part 6: testing methodologies for operational evaluation. 2011.
    9. 9)
      • 8. Iritech, Inc. Iritech. 65536 Rev 1.13.
    10. 10)
      • 2. US Army Program Executive Office. Project Manager Department of Defense Biometrics. Enterprise Information Systems [homepage on the Internet]. 2011 Available at http://www.eis.army.mil/programs/dodbiometrics.htm.
    11. 11)
      • 13. ISO/IEC 19795-2 Information technology – biometric performance testing and reporting – Part 2: Testing methodololgies for technology and scenario evaluation. 2006.
    12. 12)
      • 5. Grother, P., Quinn, G.W., Matey, J.R., et al: ‘IREX III performance of iris identification algorithms – interagency report 7836’ (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2012).
    13. 13)
      • 11. Daugman, J.: ‘How iris recognition works’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 2004, 14, (1), pp. 2130 (doi: 10.1109/TCSVT.2003.818350).
    14. 14)
      • 10. Daugman, J.: ‘Statistical richness of visual phase information: update on recognizing persons by iris patterns’, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 2001, 45, (1) (doi: 10.1023/A:1012365806338).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-bmt.2012.0078
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-bmt.2012.0078
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address