Writer verification methods from handwriting images have been widely used in biometrics, forensic casework and so on. However, their performance conducted by a computer is still far behind that of human beings. This study proposes an offline writer verification method which uses a new hybrid feature. The characteristics of this new feature are the combination of shape and pen pressure information. For shape information, the authors use the weighted direction code histogram, which is often used in Japanese handwriting recognition and writer verification methods. For pen pressure information, the authors use the texture features of infrared (IR) images obtained from a multi-band image scanner. Although the simple use of pen pressure information encoded in the IR image cannot improve the geometric mean (g-mean)-based error rate, the use of clipping process and second-order statistics can decrease the g-mean-based error rate from 4.8 to 3.2%.

References

1. 1)
  - 11. Matsumoto, H., Umeda, M.: ‘Personal authentication by handwritten characters using sequential neural network’, J. IIEEJ, 2009, 38, (5), pp. 614–622[in Japanese].
2. 2)
  - 19. Ferrer, M.A., Morales, A., Vargas, J.F.: ‘Off-line signature verification using local patterns’. Proc. Second National Conf. Telecommunications, Arequipa, Peru, May 2011, pp. 1–6.
3. 3)
  - 22. Kubat, M., Matwin, S.: ‘Addressing the curse of imbalanced training sets: one-sided selection’. Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Machine Learning, Tennessee, USA, July 1997, pp. 179–186.
4. 4)
  - 13. Vargas, J.F., Ferrer, M.A., Travieso, C.M., Alonso, J.B.: ‘Off-line signature verification based on grey level information using texture features’, Pattern Recognit., 2011, 44, (2), pp. 375–385 (doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.07.028).
5. 5)
  - 10. Narita, R., Ohyama, W., Wakabayashi, T., Kimura, F.: ‘Three dimensional rotation-free recognition of characters’. Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Document Analysis and Recognition, Beijing, China, September 2011, pp. 824–828.
6. 6)
  - 21. Veropoulos, K., Campbell, C., Cristianini, N.: ‘Controlling the sensitivity of support vector machines’. Proc. 16th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, Sweden, July 1999, pp. 55–60.
7. 7)
  - 7. Coetzer, J., Swanepoel, J., Sabourin, R.: ‘Efficient cost-sensitive human – machine collaboration for off-line signature verification’. Proc. SPIE 8297, California, USA, January 2012, pp. 82970 J.
8. 8)
  - 3. Impedovo, D., Pirlo, G.: ‘Automatic signature verification: the state of the art’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., 2008, 38, (5), pp. 609–635 (doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2008.923866).
9. 9)
  - 4. Pal, S., Blumenstein, M., Pal, U.: ‘Off-line signature verification systems: a survey’. Proc. Int. Conf. & Workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, February 2011, pp. 652–657.
10. 10)
  - 20. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: ‘Support-vector networks’, Mach. Learn., 1995, 20, (3), pp. 273–297.
11. 11)
  - 8. Furukawa, T.: ‘Detection indentations pressed by pen tip force from writing paper using infrared ray scanner’. Proc. 64th American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Oregon, USA, August 2006, pp. 19–24.
12. 12)
  - 5. Misaki, K., Umeda, M.: ‘Handwriter identification using quantitative features extracted from character patterns’, J. Jpn. Assoc. Forensic Sci. Technol., 1997, 2, (2), pp. 71–77[in Japanese].
13. 13)
  - 6. Srihari, S., Huang, C., Srinivasan, H.: ‘On the discriminability of the handwriting of twins’, J. Forensic Sci., 2008, 53, (2), pp. 430–446 (doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00682.x).
14. 14)
  - 9. Kimura, F., Wakabayashi, T., Tsuruoka, S., Miyake, Y.: ‘Improvement of handwritten Japanese character recognition using weighted direction code histogram’, Pattern Recognit., 1997, 30, (8), pp. 1329–1337 (doi: 10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00153-7).
15. 15)
  - 16. Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K., Dinstein, I.H.: ‘Textural features for image classification’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1973, 3, (6), pp. 610–621 (doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314).
16. 16)
  - 14. Ferrer, M.A., Morales, A., Vargas, J.F., Lemos, I., Quintero, M.: ‘Is it possible to automatically identify who has forged my signature? Approaching to the identification of a static signature forger’. Proc. Tenth IAPR Int. Workshop on Document Analysis Systems, Queensland, Australia, March 2012, pp. 175–179.
17. 17)
  - 15. Okawa, M., Yoshida, K.: ‘Off-line writer verification using shape and pen pressure information’. Proc.13th Int. Conf. Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, Bari, Italy, September 2012, pp. 621–626.
18. 18)
  - 12. Qiao, Y., Yasuhara, M.: ‘Recovering dynamic information from static handwritten images’. Proc. Ninth Int. Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, Tokyo, Japan, October 2004, pp. 118–123.
19. 19)
  - 2. Plamondon, R., Srihari, S.N.: ‘Online and off-line handwriting recognition: a comprehensive survey’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2000, 22, (1), pp. 63–84 (doi: 10.1109/34.824821).
20. 20)
  - 18. Otsu, N.: ‘A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1979, 9, (1), pp. 62–66 (doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076).
21. 21)
  - 1. Srihari, S.N., Cha, S.H., Arora, H., Lee, S.: ‘Individuality of handwriting’, J. Forensic Sci., 2002, 47, (4), pp. 856–872.
22. 22)
  - 17. Hanusiak, R.K., Oliveira, L.S., Justino, E., Sabourin, R.: ‘Writer verification using texture-based features’, Int. J. Doc. Anal. Recognit., 2012, 15, (3), pp. 213–226 (doi: 10.1007/s10032-011-0166-4).

Offline writer verification using pen pressure information from infrared image

References

Related content