Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess Augmented reality-based feedback for technician-in-the-loop C-arm repositioning

Interventional C-arm imaging is crucial to percutaneous orthopedic procedures as it enables the surgeon to monitor the progress of surgery on the anatomy level. Minimally invasive interventions require repeated acquisition of X-ray images from different anatomical views to verify tool placement. Achieving and reproducing these views often comes at the cost of increased surgical time and radiation. We propose a marker-free ‘technician-in-the-loop’ Augmented Reality (AR) solution for C-arm repositioning. The X-ray technician operating the C-arm interventionally is equipped with a head-mounted display system capable of recording desired C-arm poses in 3D via an integrated infrared sensor. For C-arm repositioning to a target view, the recorded pose is restored as a virtual object and visualized in an AR environment, serving as a perceptual reference for the technician. Our proof-of-principle findings from a simulated trauma surgery indicate that the proposed system can decrease the 2.76 X-ray images required for re-aligning the scanner with an intra-operatively recorded C-arm view down to zero, suggesting substantial reductions of radiation dose. The proposed AR solution is a first step towards facilitating communication between the surgeon and the surgical staff, improving the quality of surgical image acquisition, and enabling context-aware guidance for surgery rooms of the future.

References

    1. 1)
      • 12. Klein, T., Benhimane, S., Traub, J., et al: ‘Interactive guidance system for C-arm repositioning without radiation’. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2007, München, Germany, 2007, pp. 2125.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 3. Tucker, E., Fotouhi, J., Unberath, M., et al: ‘Towards clinical translation of augmented orthopedic surgery: from pre-op CT to intra-op x-ray via RGBD sensing’. Medical Imaging 2018: Imaging Informatics for Healthcare, Research, and Applications, Houston, TX, 2018, vol. 10579, p. 105790J.
    5. 5)
      • 22. Deib, G., Johnson, A., Unberath, M., et al: ‘Image guided percutaneous spine procedures using an optical see-through head mounted display: proof of concept and rationale’, J. Neurointerv. Surg., 2018, doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013649.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 21. Qian, L., Unberath, M., Yu, K., et al: ‘Towards virtual monitors for image guided interventions-real-time streaming to optical see-through head-mounted displays’, arXiv preprint arXiv:171000808, 2017.
    8. 8)
      • 20. Besl, P.J., McKay, N.D.: ‘Method for registration of 3-d shapes’. Sensor Fusion IV: Control Paradigms and Data Structures, Boston, MA, 1992, vol. 1611, pp. 586607.
    9. 9)
      • 10. Gong, R.H., Jenkins, B., Sze, R.W., et al: ‘A cost effective and high fidelity fluoroscopy simulator using the image-guided surgery toolkit (IGSTK)’. Medical Imaging 2014: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, San Diego, CA, 2014, vol. 9036, p. 903618.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 15. Fallavollita, P., Winkler, A., Habert, S., et al: ‘Desired-view controlled positioning of angiographic C-arms’. Int. Conf. on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Cambridge, MA, 2014, pp. 659666.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • 5. Hajek, J., Unberath, M., Fotouhi, J., et al: ‘Closing the calibration loop: an inside-out-tracking paradigm for augmented reality in orthopedic surgery’, Proc. Conf. on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, Granada, Spain, 2018, pp. 18.
    14. 14)
      • 1. Korovessis, P., Baikousis, A., Stamatakis, M., et al: ‘Medium- and long-term results of open reduction and internal fixation for unstable pelvic ring fractures’, Orthopedics, 2000, 23, (11), pp. 11651171.
    15. 15)
      • 19. ‘Ziehm imaging Ziehm Vision RFD 3D’, 2018. Available at https://www.ziehm.com/en/us/products/c-arms-with-flat-panel-detector/ziehm-vision-rfd-3d.html, accessed 11 June 2018.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • 7. ‘AO Foundation surgical reference’, 2018. Available at https://www2.aofoundation.org/wps/portal/surgery, accessed 11 June 2018.
    18. 18)
      • 16. Endres, F., Hess, J., Engelhard, N., et al: ‘An evaluation of the RGB-D SLAM system’. 2012 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), St Paul, MN, 2012, pp. 16911696.
    19. 19)
      • 13. Dressel, P., Wang, L., Kutter, O., et al: ‘Intraoperative positioning of mobile c-arms using artificial fluoroscopy’. Medical Imaging 2010: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling, San Diego, CA, 2010, vol. 7625, p. 762506.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • 17. Bier, B., Unberath, M., Zaech, J.N., et al: ‘X-ray-transform invariant anatomical landmark detection for pelvic trauma surgery’, Proc. Conf. on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, Granada, Spain, 2018, pp. 18.
    22. 22)
      • 6. Wheeless, C.R.: ‘Radiology of pelvic fractures’, in Moore, D. (ED.): ‘‘Wheeless’ textbook of orthopaedics’ (CR Wheeless, MD, 1996)http://www.wheelessonline.com/ortho/radiology_of_pelvic_fractures. Available at http://www.wheelessonline.com/ortho/radiology_of_pelvic_fractures.
    23. 23)
      • 11. Stefan, P., Habert, S., Winkler, A., et al: ‘A mixed-reality approach to radiation-free training of C-arm based surgery’. Int. Conf. on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Quebec City, Canada, 2017, pp. 540547.
    24. 24)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/htl.2018.5066
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/htl.2018.5066
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address