access icon openaccess Avatars and virtual agents – relationship interfaces for the elderly

In the Digital Era, the authors witness a change in the relationship between the patient and the care-giver or Health Maintenance Organization's providing the health services. Another fact is the use of various technologies to increase the effectiveness and quality of health services across all primary and secondary users. These technologies range from telemedicine systems, decision making tools, online and self-services applications and virtual agents; all providing information and assistance. The common thread between all these digital implementations, is they all require human machine interfaces. These interfaces must be interactive, user friendly and inviting, to create user involvement and cooperation incentives. The challenge is to design interfaces which will best fit the target users and enable smooth interaction especially, for the elderly users. Avatars and Virtual Agents are one of the interfaces used for both home care monitoring and companionship. They are also inherently multimodal in nature and allow an intimate relation between the elderly users and the Avatar. This study discusses the need and nature of these relationship models, the challenges of designing for the elderly. The study proposes key features for the design and evaluation in the area of assistive applications using Avatar and Virtual agents for the elderly users.

Inspec keywords: geriatrics; man-machine systems; avatars; telemedicine; decision making

Other keywords: human machine interfaces; home care monitoring; elderly users; decision making tools; avatars; telemedicine systems; virtual agents

Subjects: Systems theory applications in biology and medicine; Biomedical communication; Graphical user interfaces; Biomedical engineering; Telecommunication applications; Virtual reality; Biology and medical computing

References

    1. 1)
      • 11. Goldman, C.V., Degani, A.: ‘A team-oriented framework for human-automation interaction: implication for the design of an advanced cruise control system’. Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, September 2012, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 23542358.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • 12. Shaked, N., Artelt, D.: ‘The use of multimodality in avatars and virtual agents’, in Shaked, N., Winter, U.: ‘Design of multimodal mobile interfaces’ (Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2016), pp. 125144.
    4. 4)
      • 1. Shepherd, J.: ‘What is the digital era?’, in Doukidis, G., Mylonopoulos, N., Pouloudi, N. (Eds.): ‘Social and economic transformation in the digital era’ (2004), pp. 118.
    5. 5)
      • 14. GeriJoy: ‘Senior living’, 2015. Available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6845226/http://www.gerijoy.com/.
    6. 6)
      • 15. Deloitte: ‘2015 Global health care outlook, common goal, competing priorities’, 2015. Available at https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Life-Sciences-Health-Care/gx-lshc-2015-health-care-outlook-global.pdf.
    7. 7)
      • 16. GUIDE Consortium: ‘User interaction & application requirements – deliverable D2.1’, 2011.
    8. 8)
      • 19. Shaked, N., Winter, U.: ‘Introduction to the evolution of mobile multimodality’, in Shaked, N., Winter, U.: ‘Design of multimodal mobile interfaces’ (Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2016), pp. 118.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 2. Lesin, S.: ‘‘Frederickmedical virtual assistant’. Final project, Software Engineering Department, Afeka College for Engineering, Israel, 2016. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foQIVavHA4Y.
    11. 11)
      • 3. D'Andrea, A., D'Ulizia, A., Ferri, F., et al: ‘A multimodal pervasive framework for ambient assisted living’. PETRA ‘09: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on PErvsive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, New York, NY, USA, 2009.
    12. 12)
      • 6. Yaghoubzadeh, R., Kramer, M., Pitsch, K., et al: ‘Virtual agents as daily assistants for elderly or cognitively impaired people’. Int. Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents, 2013, pp. 7991.
    13. 13)
      • 10. Rich, C., Sidner, C.L., Lesh, N.B.: ‘Collagen: applying collaborative discourse theory to human-computer interaction’, AI Mag., 2001, 22, (4), pp. 1525.
    14. 14)
      • 7. Cassell, J.: ‘Embodied conversational agents: representation and intelligence in user interfaces’, AI Mag., 2001, 22, (4), p. 67.
    15. 15)
      • 17. Vardoulakis, L.P., Ring, L., Barry, B., et al: ‘Designing relational agents as long term social companions for older adults’. Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Virtual Agents, 2012, pp. 289302.
    16. 16)
      • 18. Olsson, T.: ‘Layers of user expectations of future technologies: an early framework’. CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2014, pp. 19571962.
    17. 17)
      • 5. Salces, F.J.S.D., England, D., Llewellyn-Jones, D.: ‘Designing for all in the house’. CLIHC ‘05: 2005 Latin American conference on HCI, 2005, pp. 283288.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • 4. Richter, K., Hellenschmidt, M.: ‘Interacting with the ambience: multimodal interaction and ambient intelligence’. W3C Workshop on Multi-modal Interaction, France, 2004.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/htl.2017.0009
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/htl.2017.0009
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading