Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess Identifying radiotherapy target volumes in brain cancer by image analysis

To establish the optimal radiotherapy fields for treating brain cancer patients, the tumour volume is often outlined on magnetic resonance (MR) images, where the tumour is clearly visible, and mapped onto computerised tomography images used for radiotherapy planning. This process requires considerable clinical experience and is time consuming, which will continue to increase as more complex image sequences are used in this process. Here, the potential of image analysis techniques for automatically identifying the radiation target volume on MR images, and thereby assisting clinicians with this difficult task, was investigated. A gradient-based level set approach was applied on the MR images of five patients with grades II, III and IV malignant cerebral glioma. The relationship between the target volumes produced by image analysis and those produced by a radiation oncologist was also investigated. The contours produced by image analysis were compared with the contours produced by an oncologist and used for treatment. In 93% of cases, the Dice similarity coefficient was found to be between 60 and 80%. This feasibility study demonstrates that image analysis has the potential for automatic outlining in the management of brain cancer patients, however, more testing and validation on a much larger patient cohort is required.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 18. Wang, T., Cheng, I., Basu, A.: ‘Fully automatic brain tumour segmentation using a normalized Guassian Bayesian classifier and 3D fluid vector flow’. Proc. 17th Int. Conf. on Image Processing (ICIP), Hong Kong, China, 26–29 September 2010, pp. 25532556.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 2. Deimling, M. (Ed.): ‘Gliomas recent results in cancer research’ (Springer, 2009).
    10. 10)
      • 37. Sethian, J.A.: ‘Level set methods and fast marching methods: evolving interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision, and materials science’ (Cambridge University Press, 1999, 1st edn.).
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • 10. ICRU 62: Supplement to ICRU Report 50 ‘Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy’, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, USA, 1999.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • 24. EORTC-26052: ‘Phase III trial comparing conventional adjuvant temozolomide with dose-intensive temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma’. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). Available at https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00304031.
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
      • 23. Bomford, C.K., Kunkler, I.H.: ‘Walter and Miller's textbook of radiotherapy: radiation physics, therapy and oncology’ (Churchill Livingston, 2003).
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
      • 28. Li, C., Xu, C., Gui, C., et al: ‘Level set evolution without re-initialization: a new variational formulation’. Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), San Diego, CA, USA, 20–26 June 2005, pp. 32433254.
    26. 26)
      • 3. Cancer Research UK: ‘Cancer stats report – brain, other CNS and intracranial tumours key facts’, January 2014.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Nobi, M.N., Yousuf, M.A.: ‘A new method to remove noise in magnetic resonance and ultrasound images’, J. Sci. Res., 2001, 3, (1), pp. 8189.
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
      • 22. Schmidt, M., Levner, I., Greiner, R., et al: ‘Segmenting brain tumors using alignment-based features’. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 15–17 December 2005, pp. 215220.
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
    35. 35)
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
      • 9. ICRU 50: Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, USA, 1993.
    38. 38)
    39. 39)
    40. 40)
    41. 41)
    42. 42)
    43. 43)
      • 20. Ho, S., Bullitt, E., Gerig, G.: ‘Level-set evolution with region competition: automatic 3D segmentation of brain tumours’. Proc. of Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Quebec, Canada, 11–15 August 2002, pp. 532535.
    44. 44)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/htl.2015.0014
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/htl.2015.0014
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address