Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess Design and development of a low-cost biphasic charge-balanced functional electric stimulator and its clinical validation

Functional electric stimulators that produce near-ideal, charge-balanced biphasic stimulation waveforms with interphase delay are considered safer and more efficacious than conventional stimulators. An indigenously designed, low-cost, portable FES device named InStim is developed. It features a charge-balanced biphasic single channel. The authors present the complete design, mathematical analysis of the circuit and the clinical evaluation of the device. The developed circuit was tested on stroke patients affected by foot drop problems. It was tested both under laboratory conditions and in clinical settings. The key building blocks of this circuit are low dropout regulators, a DC–DC voltage booster and a single high-power current source OP-Amp with current-limiting capabilities. This allows the device to deliver high-voltage, constant current, biphasic pulses without the use of a bulky step-up transformer. The advantages of the proposed design over the currently existing devices include improved safety features (zero DC current, current-limiting mechanism and safe pulses), waveform morphology that causes less muscle fatigue, cost-effectiveness and compact power-efficient circuit design with minimal components. The device is also capable of producing appropriate ankle dorsiflexion in patients having foot drop problems of various Medical Research Council scale grades.

References

    1. 1)
      • 13. Masdar, A., Ibrahim, B.S.K.K., Abdul Jamil, M.M.: ‘Development of low-cost current controlled stimulator for paraplegics’, Int. J. Integr. Eng., 2013, 4, (3), pp. 4047.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 10. Velloso, J.B., Souza, M.N.: ‘A programmable system of functional electrical stimulation (FES)’. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2007. Twenty-Ninth Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE, 2007, pp. 22342237.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 18. Sabut, S.K., Sikdar, C., Kumar, R., Mahadevappa, M.: ‘Functional electrical stimulation of dorsiflexor muscle: effects on dorsiflexor strength, plantarflexor spasticity, and motor recovery in stroke patients’, Neurorehabilitation, 2011, 29, (4), pp. 393400.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 2. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/IPG278, accessed January 2012.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 5. Lo, Y.K., Hill, R., Chen, K., Liu, W.: ‘Precision control of pulse widths for charge balancing in functional electrical stimulation’. Sixth Int. IEEE/EMBS Conf. on Neural Engineering (NER), 2013, pp. 14811484.
    16. 16)
      • 14. Wang, H., Guan, G., He, Q., et al: ‘An electrical muscle simulator based on functional electrical stimulation. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO)’, 2012, pp. 19061911.
    17. 17)
      • 1. http://www.who.int/disabilities/technology/en/, accessed 16 January 2015. WHO note on Assistive devices/technologies.
    18. 18)
      • 11. Brunetti, F., Garay, A., Moreno, J.C., Pons, J.L.: ‘Enhancing functional electrical stimulation for emerging rehabilitation robotics in the framework of hyper project’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2011, pp. 16.
    19. 19)
      • 6. Nadeau, P., Sawan, M.: ‘A flexible high voltage biphasic current-controlled stimulator’. IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conf. BioCAS, 2006, pp. 206209.
    20. 20)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/htl.2015.0001
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/htl.2015.0001
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address