access icon openaccess Wearable technologies – future challenges for implementation in healthcare services

The growing use of wearable technologies increases the ability to have more information from the patient including clinical, behavioural and self-monitored data. The availability and large amounts of data that did not exist before brings an opportunity to develop new tools with intelligent analyses and decision support tools for use in clinical practice. It also opens new possibilities for the patients by providing them with more information and decision support tools specially designed for them, and empowers them in managing their own health conditions, keeping their autonomy. These new developments drive a change in healthcare delivery models and the relationship between patients and healthcare providers. It raises challenges for the healthcare systems in how to implement these new technologies and the growing amount of information in clinical practice, integrate it into the clinical workflows of the various healthcare providers. The future challenge for healthcare will be how to use the developing knowledge in a way that will bring added value to healthcare professionals, healthcare organisations and patients without increasing the workload and cost of the healthcare services. For wearable technology developers, the challenge is to develop solutions that can be easily integrated and used by healthcare professionals considering the existing constraints.

Inspec keywords: telemedicine; health care; decision support systems

Other keywords: healthcare services; healthcare professionals; clinical data; wearable technologies; behavioural data; self-monitored data; decision support tools; healthcare organisations; healthcare providers; healthcare delivery models

Subjects: Biology and medical computing; Biomedical communication; Telecommunication applications; Decision support systems

References

    1. 1)
      • 7. Ahanathapillai, V., Amor, J.D., Tadeusiak, M., James, C.J.: ‘Wrist-worn accelerometer to detect postural transitions and walking patterns’. IFMBE Proc., 2014, vol. 41, pp. 15151518.
    2. 2)
      • 4. Yee, K., Yeung, A., Robertson, T., et al: ‘A networked system for self-management of drug therapy and wellness’. Wireless Health ‘10, October 2010, San Diego, CA, USA.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 6. Collin, C., et al: ‘Barthel index of activities of daily living’, 1988, https://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/igec/tools/function/barthelADLs.pdf.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • 2. Lewy, H., Kaufman, G.: ‘The Maccabi multidisciplinary center for disease management in ‘Recipes for sustainable healthcare’ sponsored by Abbvie, Philips and EUPHA’. Brussels, May 2013.
    7. 7)
      • 12. Lewy, H.: ‘Integrated care-benefits and outcomes’. Measuring the Benefits of Health IT Systems.COI summit, Rome, Italy, October 2014.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 13. Lewy, H.: ‘Integrated care. Book chapter in: technologies for diagnosis and treatment in innovations in the diagnosis and treatment of dementia’. Adv. Med. Technol. Clin. Pract. (AMTCP) Book Series, 2014.
    10. 10)
      • 16. Raghupathi, W., Raghupathi, V.: ‘Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential’, Health Inf. Sci. Syst., 2014, 2, (3).
    11. 11)
      • 3. Samà, A., Pérez-López, C., Rodríguez-Martín, D., et al: ‘A double closed loop to enhance the quality of life of Parkinson's Disease patients: REMPARK system’. InMed Conf., Piraeus, Greece February 2014.
    12. 12)
      • 5. Office of Health and Information Highway: ‘International Activities in Tele-homecare: Background paper’. Health Canada, September 1998.
    13. 13)
      • 9. Papadopoulos, H., Katasonov, A., James, C., et al: ‘An integrated system for unobtrusive smart environments for independent living (USEFIL)’, JCNC J. Comput. Netw. Commun./Special Issue on ‘Healthcare Appl. over Internet of Things’, 2013.
    14. 14)
      • 1. Currell, R., Urquhart, C., Wainwright, P., Lewis, R.: ‘Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Review)’, (JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd., New York, NY, USA, 2010).
    15. 15)
      • 10. Office for National Statistics: ‘Statistical Bulletin. National population projections, 2008 based’ (Office for National Statistics, 2009).
    16. 16)
      • 8. Mohiuddin, S.G., Brailsford, S.C., James, C.J., et al: ‘A multi-state model to improve the design of an automated system to monitor the activity patterns of patients with bipolar disorder’, J. Operat. Res. Soc. (JORS), 2012, 64, pp. 132.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/htl.2014.0104
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/htl.2014.0104
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading