access icon openaccess Wireless wearable range-of-motion sensor system for upper and lower extremity joints: a validation study

Range-of-motion (ROM) assessment is a critical assessment tool during the rehabilitation process. The conventional approach uses the goniometer which remains the most reliable instrument but it is usually time-consuming and subject to both intra- and inter-therapist measurement errors. An automated wireless wearable sensor system for the measurement of ROM has previously been developed by the current authors. Presented is the correlation and accuracy of the automated wireless wearable sensor system against a goniometer in measuring ROM in the major joints of upper (UEs) and lower extremities (LEs) in 19 healthy subjects and 20 newly disabled inpatients through intra (same) subject comparison of ROM assessments between the sensor system against goniometer measurements by physical therapists. In healthy subjects, ROM measurements using the new sensor system were highly correlated with goniometry, with 95% of differences < 20° and 10° for most movements in major joints of UE and LE, respectively. Among inpatients undergoing rehabilitation, ROM measurements using the new sensor system were also highly correlated with goniometry, with 95% of the differences being < 20° and 25° for most movements in the major joints of UE and LE, respectively.

Inspec keywords: biomedical equipment; motion measurement; goniometers; wireless sensor networks; biomechanics; patient rehabilitation

Other keywords: wireless wearable range-of-motion sensor system; range-of-motion assessment; upper extremity joints; lower extremity joints; rehabilitation process; goniometer measurements

Subjects: Spatial variables measurement; Physics of body movements; Sensing devices and transducers; Spatial variables measurement; Wireless sensor networks; Patient care and treatment; Patient care and treatment

References

    1. 1)
      • 5. Ferriero, G., Vercelli, S., Sartorio, F., et al: ‘Reliability of a smartphone-based goniometer for knee joint goniometry’, Int. J. Rehabil. Res., 2012, [Epub ahead of print].
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 11. Gibbs, P.T., Asada, H.H.: ‘Wearable conductive fiber sensors for multi-axis human joint angle measurements’, J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 2005, 2, (7), pp. 17431746.
    5. 5)
      • 14. Watanabe, T., Saito, H.: ‘Tests of wireless wearable sensor system in joint angle measurement of lower limbs’. Conf. Proc. IEEE Engineering in Medicine Biology Society, Boston, MA, USA, September 2011, pp. 54695472.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 8. Draper, C.E., Chew, K.T., Wang, R., Jennings, F., Gold, G.E., Fredericson, M.: ‘Comparison of quadriceps angle measurements using short-arm and long-arm goniometers: correlation with MRI’, PM&R, 2011, 3, pp. 111116.
    9. 9)
      • 16. Clarkson, H.M.: ‘Musculoskeletal assessment: joint range of motion and manual muscle strength’ (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, USA, 2000, 2nd edn.).
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 4. Hellebrandt, F.A., Duvall, E.N., Moore, M.L.: ‘The measurement of joint motion: part III. Reliability of goniometry’, Phys. Ther. Rev., 1949, 29, pp. 302307.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 20. Kolber, M.J., Hanney, W.J.: ‘The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer: a technical report’, Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 2012, 7, pp. 306313.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • 1. Gajdosik, R.L., Bohannon, R.W.: ‘Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity’, Phys. Ther., 1987, 67, pp. 18671872.
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/htl.2014.0100
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/htl.2014.0100
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading