When change happens: computer assistance and image guidance for minimally invasive therapy

Cristian A. Linte; Ziv Yaniv

When change happens: computer assistance and image guidance for minimally invasive therapy

View Fulltext

Author(s): Cristian A. Linte ¹ and Ziv Yaniv ²
- Affiliations: 1: Biomedical Engineering and Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14467, USA;
  2: Children's National Medical Center, Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Washington, DC 20010, USA
Source: Volume 1, Issue 1, March 2014, p. 2 – 5
DOI: 10.1049/htl.2014.0058 , Online ISSN 2053-3713

Received 25/03/2014, Accepted 25/03/2014, Published 31/03/2014

Computer-assisted interventions are medical procedures that rely on image guidance and computer-based systems to provide visualisation and navigation information to the clinician, when direct vision of the sites or targets to be treated is not available, during minimally invasive procedures. Recent advances in medical image acquisition and processing, accompanied by technological breakthroughs in image fusion, visualisation and display have accelerated the adoption of minimally invasive approaches for a variety of medical procedures. This Letter is intended to serve as a brief overview of available image guidance and computer-assisted technology in the context of popular minimally invasive applications, while outlining some of the limitations and challenges in the transition from laboratory to clinical care.

References

1. 1)
  - 2. Soares, G.M., Murphy, T.P.: ‘Clinical interventional radiology: parallels with the evolution of general surgery’, Semin. Intervent. Radiol., 2005, 22, (1), pp. 10–14 (doi: 10.1055/s-2005-869571).
2. 2)
  - 1. Litynski, G.S.: ‘Endoscopic surgery: the history, the pioneers’, World J Surg., 1999, 23, (8), pp. 745–753 (doi: 10.1007/s002689900576).
3. 3)
  - 17. Jolesz, F.: ‘Advanced multi-modality image guided operating (AMIGO) suite’. Proc. Fourth Image-guided Therapy (NCIGT) Workshop, 2011, pp. 15–6.
4. 4)
  - 18. Yang, X.: ‘Interventional molecural imaging’, Radiology, 2010, 254, pp. 651–4 (doi: 10.1148/radiol.09091264).
5. 5)
  - 15. Varga, E., Pattynama, P.M.T., Freudenthal, A.: ‘Manipulation of mental models of anatomy in interventional radiology and its consequences for design of human–computer interaction’, Cogn. Technol. Work, 2012, 15, (4), pp. 1–17.
6. 6)
  - 13. Figl, M., Rueckert, D., Hawkes, D., et al: ‘Image guidance for robotic minimally invasive coronary artery bypass’, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., 2010, 34, pp. 61–8 (doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2009.08.002).
7. 7)
  - 8. Holmes III,, D.R., Rettmann, M., Robb, R.A.: ‘Visualization in image-guided interventions’ in Peters, T.M., Cleary, K. (Eds.): ‘Image-guided interventions: technology and applications’ (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2008), pp. 45–80.
8. 8)
  - 19. Hynynen, K.: ‘MRIgHIFU: a tool for image-guided therapeutics’, J. Magn. Reson. Imag., 2011, 34, (3), pp. 482–493 (doi: 10.1002/jmri.22649).
9. 9)
  - 7. Moore, J., Wiles, A., Wedlake, C., Kiaii, B., Peters, T.M.: ‘Integration of trans-esophageal echocardiography with magnetic tracking technology for cardiac interventions’. Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 2010: Visualization, Image guided Procedures and Modeling, 2010, vol. 7625, pp. 76252Y-1–10.
10. 10)
  - 9. Neumuth, T., Jannin, P., Strauss, G., Meixensberger, J., Burgert, O.: ‘Validation of knowledge acquisition for surgical process models’, J Am. Med. Inf. Assoc., 2009, 16, pp. 72–80 (doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2748).
11. 11)
  - 12. Costa, F., Porazzi, E., Restelli, U., et al: ‘Economic study: a cost-effectiveness analysis of an intraoperative compared with a preoperative image-guided system in lumbar pedicle screw fixation in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis’, Spine J., doi: 10.10.16/j.spinee.2013.10.019..
12. 12)
  - 14. Gr atzel, C., Fong, T., Grange, S., Baur, C.: ‘A non-contact mouse for surgeon-computer interaction’, Technol. Health. Care, 2004, 12, (3), pp. 245–257.
13. 13)
  - 3. Cleary, K., Peters, T.M.: ‘Image-guided interventions: technology review and clinical applications’, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2010, 12, pp. 119–142 (doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-105249).
14. 14)
  - 5. Yaniv, Z., Cleary, K.: ‘Image-guided procedures: a review’. Tech. Rep., CAIMR TR-2006-3, Image Science and Information systems Center, Georgetown University, April 2006.
15. 15)
  - 10. Bodenheimer, T.: ‘High and rising health care costs. Part 2: technologic innovation’, Ann. Intern. Med., 2005, 142, (11), pp. 932–937 (doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-11-200506070-00012).
16. 16)
  - 4. Peters, T., Cleary, K. (Eds.): ‘Image-Guided Interventions Technology and Applications’ (Springer, 2008).
17. 17)
  - 6. Linte, C.A., Davenport, K.P., Cleary, K., et al: ‘On mixed reality environments for minimally invasive therapy guidance: systems architecture, successes and challenges in their implementation from laboratory to clinic’, Comput. Med. Imaging and Graph., 2013, 37, (2), pp. 83–97 (doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2012.12.002).
18. 18)
  - 16. Katić, D., Wekerle, A.-L., Görtler, J., et al: ‘Context-aware augmented reality in laparoscopic surgery’, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., 2013, 37, (2), pp. 174–182 (doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2013.03.003).
19. 19)
  - 11. Novak, E.J., Silverstein, M.D., Bozic, K.J.: ‘The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty’, J Bone Joint Surg Am., 2007, 89, (11), pp. 2389–2397 (doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01109).

Login

Not registered yet?

Share

Tools

Login to add to favourites

Key

When change happens: computer assistance and image guidance for minimally invasive therapy

References

Related content