References

• 1. 1)
     • 13. Philp, J.: ‘The bioeconomy, the challenge of the century for policy makers’, New Biotechnol., 2018, 40, pp. 11–19.
  2. 2)
     • 40. Lambert, R.: ‘Dip into the reservoir of innovation’, Camb. Manuf. Rev., Spring, 2004, pp. 2–5.
  3. 3)
     • 14. Baker, M.: ‘Seek out stronger science’, Nature, 2016, 537, pp. 703–704.
  4. 4)
     • 7. Corolleur, C.D.F., Carrere, M., Mangematin, V.: ‘Turning scientific and technological human capital into economic capital: the experience of biotech start-ups in France’, Res. Policy, 2004, 33, pp. 631–642.
  5. 5)
     • 9. Coalition of State Bioscience Institutes (CBSI): ‘Demand for talent: current and projected workforce trends in the life science industry’, A joint report of CBSI and Booz & Co, 2013.
  6. 6)
     • 33. edX. Available atwww.edx.org/, accessed 07 December 2017.
  7. 7)
     • 3. Woolston, C.: ‘A love-hurt relationship’, Nature, 2017, 550, pp. 549–552.
  8. 8)
     • 6. National Academy of Sciences: ‘Reshaping the graduate education of scientists and engineers’ (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1995).
  9. 9)
     • 41. Imperial College. Available at http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/centres/engineeringbiology/eventssummary/event_7-11-2017-13-56-39, accessed 13 December 2017.
  10. 10)
      • 10. ABPI: ‘Bridging the skills gap in the biopharmaceutical industry: maintaining the UK's leading position in life sciences’ (Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, London, 2015).
  11. 11)
      • 42. Wallman, S., Coleman, M., Fino, M., et al: ‘Training technicians to support the bioeconomy: defining the need; designing and implementing innovative solutions’, Ind. Biotechnol., 2013, 9, pp. 275–281.
  12. 12)
      • 35. SynBio4All. Available at https://cri-paris.org/synbio/, accessed 13 December 2017.
  13. 13)
      • 18. National Academy of Sciences: ‘Undergraduate chemistry education. A workshop summary’ (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2014).
  14. 14)
      • 5. Nature: ‘Life after academia’, Nat. Editorial, 2016, 537, p. 585.
  15. 15)
      • 34. BE-Basic Foundation: ‘MOOC industrial biotechnology’. Available at www.be-basic.org/news-center/news/mooc-industrial-biotechnology.html, accessed 07 December 2017.
  16. 16)
      • 28. Lin, C.S.K., Pfaltzgraff, L.A., Herrero-Davila, L., et al: ‘Food waste as a valuable resource for the production of chemicals, materials and fuels. Current situation and global perspective’, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, pp. 426–464.
  17. 17)
      • 38. Catapult. Available at https://catapult.org.uk/, accessed 07 December 2017.
  18. 18)
      • 29. Center for Biorenewable Chemicals. Available at www.cbirc.iastate.edu/, accessed 07 December 2017.
  19. 19)
      • 17. Liu, D., Hoynes-O'Connor, A., Zhang, F.: ‘Bridging the gap between systems biology and synthetic biology’, Front. Microbiol., 2013, 4, p. 211, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00211.
  20. 20)
      • 31. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: ‘Indicators for monitoring undergraduate STEM education’ (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2017).
  21. 21)
      • 27. Kuntz, M.: ‘Scientists should oppose the drive of postmodern ideology’, Trends Biotechnol., 2016, 34, pp. 943–945.
  22. 22)
      • 30. Haen, K.M., Raman, D.R., Polush, E., et al: ‘Training the next generation of creative, innovative and adaptive scientists and engineers: the NSF Engineering Research Center for Biorenewable Chemicals (CBiRC) – research experience for undergraduates’, Educ. Chem. Eng., 2012, 7, pp. 230–240.
  23. 23)
      • 20. Tadmor, B., Tidor, B.: ‘Interdisciplinary research and education at the biology-engineering-computer science interface: a perspective’, Drug Discov. Today, 2005, 10, pp. 1706–1712.
  24. 24)
      • 15. National Research Council: ‘Frontiers in massive data analysis’ (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2013). Available at https://doi.org/10.17226/18374.
  25. 25)
      • 11. Carlson, R.: ‘Estimating the biotech sector's contribution to the US economy’, Nat. Biotechnol., 2016, 34, pp. 247–255.
  26. 26)
      • 2. American Society for Microbiology: ‘Microbe-powered jobs: how microbiologists can help build the bioeconomy’ (American Academy of Microbiology, Washington, DC, 2013).
  27. 27)
      • 43. Westfall, P.J., Gardner, T.S.: ‘Industrial fermentation of renewable diesel fuels’, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2011, 22, pp. 344–350.
  28. 28)
      • 12. Extance, A.: ‘The human element’, Chem. World Careers Blog, 2016. Available at www.chemistryworld.com/careers/what-skills-will-you-need-in-2026/1017241.article.
  29. 29)
      • 45. Lewis, P.: ‘Technician roles, skills, and training in industrial biotechnology: an analysis’ (The Gatsby Charitable Foundation, London, 2016).
  30. 30)
      • 22. Woodley, J.M., Breuer, M., Mink, D.: ‘A future perspective on the role of industrial biotechnology for chemicals production’, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2013, 91, pp. 2029–2036.
  31. 31)
      • 8. Mascarelli, A.: ‘Environmental puzzle solvers’, Nature, 2013, 494, pp. 507–509.
  32. 32)
      • 32. Coursera. Available at www.coursera.org/, accessed 07 December 2017.
  33. 33)
      • 19. Botstein, D: ‘Technological innovation leads to fundamental understanding in cell biology’, Mol. Biol. Cell, 2010, 21, pp. 3791–3792.
  34. 34)
      • 44. Glaser, V.: ‘Overview: meeting current needs and assessing future opportunities to drive the global bioeconomy’, Ind. Biotechnol., 2013, 9, pp. 271–274.
  35. 35)
      • 25. Kuldell, N.: ‘Authentic teaching and learning through engineering biology’, J. Biol. Eng., 2007, 1, p. 8. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-1-8.
  36. 36)
      • 21. National Academy of Engineering: ‘Engineering societies and undergraduate engineering education: proceedings of a workshop’ (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2017).
  37. 37)
      • 4. National Academy of Sciences: ‘The postdoctoral experience revisited’ (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2014).
  38. 38)
      • 26. National Academy of Sciences: ‘Gene drives on the horizon: advancing science, navigating uncertainty, and aligning research with public values’ (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2016).
  39. 39)
      • 36. National Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training (NIBRT). Available at www.nibrt.ie/, accessed 07 December 2017.
  40. 40)
      • 37. Gauvreau, D., Winickoff, D., Philp, J.: ‘Engineering biology and the grand challenges: do we need a new R&D&I model?’, Eng. Biol., 2018, 2, (1), pp. 2–6.
  41. 41)
      • 39. OECD: ‘Supply and demand chain inhibitors in industrial biotechnology’ (OECD Publishing, Paris, 2005).
  42. 42)
      • 16. Panke, S.: ‘Engineering biology – engineering in biotechnology’, Committee on Applied Bioscience, Swiss Academy of Engineering Sciences, Zurich, 2008.
  43. 43)
      • 23. Delebecque, C., Philp, J.: ‘Training for engineering biology jobs in the new bioeconomy’, Science, 2015, doi: 10.1126/science.caredit.a1500143.
  44. 44)
      • 47. Institution of Chemical Engineers: ‘University accreditation’. Available at http://www.icheme.org/accreditation/university-accreditation.aspx, accessed 19 December 2017.
  45. 45)
      • 24. Rai, A., Boyle, J.: ‘Engineering biology: caught between property rights, the public domain, and the commons’, PLoS Biol., 2007, 5, p. 3. Available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050058.
  46. 46)
      • 46. Industrial Biotechnology Innovation Centre: ‘HND’. Available at http://www.ibioic.com/learning/skills/hnd/d16/, accessed 19 December 2017.
  47. 47)
      • 1. OECD: ‘The innovation imperative. Contributing to productivity, growth and well-being’ (OECD Publishing, Paris, 2015).
  48. 48)
      • 48. Lowery, G.: ‘Tougher grading is one reason for high STEM dropout rate’, Cornell Chronicle, 2 April 2010.