http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess From responsible research to responsible innovation: challenges in implementation

  • HTML
    56.8037109375Kb
  • XML
    63.3740234375Kb
  • PDF
    147.6884765625Kb
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/enb/1/1/ENB.2017.0010.html;jsessionid=6bf3389rgmmlp.x-iet-live-01?itemId=%2fcontent%2fjournals%2f10.1049%2fenb.2017.0010&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

    1. 1)
      • D. Willetts .
        1. Willetts, D.: ‘Eight great technologies’ (Policy Exchange, 2013), https://policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/eight-great-technologies.pdf, accessed 12 March2017.
        .
    2. 2)
      • 2. European Political Strategy Centre: ‘Opportunity now: Europe's mission to innovate’ (EPSC Strategic Notes, no. (15), 5th July2016), https://ec.europa.eu/epsc/sites/epsc/files/strategic_note_issue_15.pdf, accessed 8 March2017.
        . , 15
    3. 3)
      • (2009)
        3. OECD: ‘The bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda’ (OECD, Paris, International Futures Programme, 2009), http://www.oecd.org/futures/long-termtechnologicalsocietalchallenges/40922867.pdf, accessed 12 March2017.
        .
    4. 4)
      • G. Chambers , A. Dreisin , M. Pragnell .
        4. Chambers, G., Dreisin, A., Pragnell, M.: ‘The British bioeconomy: an assessment of the impact of the bioeconomy on the UK economy’. Capital Economics, Report to BBSRC, 2015, http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/documents/capital-economics-british-bioeconomy-report-11-june-2015/, accessed 12 March2017.
        .
    5. 5)
      • (2016)
        5. Synthetic Biology Leadership Council: ‘Biodesign for the Bioeconomy: UK synthetic biology strategic plan’ (SBLC, 2016) https://connect.innovateuk.org/documents/2826135/31405930/BioDesign+for+the+Bioeconomy+2016+DIGITAL+updated+21_03_2016.pdf/d0409f15-bad3-4f55-be03-430bc7ab4e7e, accessed 12 March2017.
        .
    6. 6)
      • J. Tait , D. Wield , J. Chataway . (2008)
        6. Tait, J., Wield, D., Chataway, J., et al: ‘Health Biotechnology to 2030’. (OECD International Futures Project, 2008), http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/10/40922867.pdf, accessed 8th March2017, p. 51.
        .
    7. 7)
      • (2012)
        7. European Union: ‘Responsible Research and Innovation: Europe's ability to respond to societal challenges’. (EU, 2012) https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_public_engagement/responsible-research-and-innovation-leaflet_en.pdf, accessed 12th March2017.
        .
    8. 8)
      • H. Zwart , L. Landeweerd , H. van Rooij .
        8. Zwart, H., Landeweerd, L., van Rooij, H.: ‘Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSI’ to ‘RRI’, Life Sci. Soc. Policy, 2014, 10, (11), pp. 119, doi:10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x, http://www.lsspjournal.com/content/10/1/11.
        . Life Sci. Soc. Policy , 11 , 1 - 19
    9. 9)
      • B. Wynne .
        9. Wynne, B.: ‘Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science – hitting the notes but missing the music’, Community Genet., 2006, 9, pp. 211220.
        . Community Genet. , 211 - 220
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • R. Von Schomberg . (1998)
        12. Von Schomberg, R.: ‘An appraisal of the working in practice of directive 90/220/EEC on the deliberate release of genetically modified organisms’. (STOA Panel, European Parliament, 1998), http://www.iatp-web.us/iatp/files/An_Appraisal_of_the_Working_in_Practice_of_Dir.pdf, accessed 12 March2017.
        .
    13. 13)
      • J. Tait .
        13. Tait, J.: ‘Upstream engagement and the governance of science: the shadow of the GM crops experience in Europe’. EMBO Reports, 2009, vol. 10, pp. 1822.
        . , 18 - 22
    14. 14)
      • R. Willis , J. Wilsdon . (2004)
        14. Willis, R., Wilsdon, J.: ‘See-through science – why public engagement needs to move upstream’ (Demos, London, UK, 2004).
        .
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • D. Bhattachary , J.P. Calitz , A. Hunter .
        16. Bhattachary, D., Calitz, J.P., Hunter, A.: ‘Synthetic biology dialogue’, (Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and ScienceWise, 2010, http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/web/FILES/Reviews/1006-synthetic-biology-dialogue.pdf, accessed 12 March2017.
        .
    17. 17)
      • J. Stilgoe , M. Kearnes . (2007)
        17. Stilgoe, J., Kearnes, M.: ‘Nanodialogues report: engaging research councils’ (Demos, London, 2007) http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20091004173547/http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/CMSWeb/Downloads/Other/NanodialogueEngagingResearchCouncilsReport.pdf, accessed 12 March2017.
        .
    18. 18)
      • L. Landeweerd , D. Townend , J. Mesman .
        18. Landeweerd, L., Townend, D., Mesman, J., et al: ‘Reflections on different governance styles in regulating science: a contribution to ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’, Life Sci. Soc. Policy, 2015, 11, (8), pp. 122, doi: 10.1186/s40504-015-0026-y.
        . Life Sci. Soc. Policy , 8 , 1 - 22
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • J. Tait .
        20. Tait, J.: ‘Bringing it all together’. In annual report of the government chief scientific adviser: innovation: managing risk not avoiding it; evidence and case studies, 2014, pp. 129136, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/381906/14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence.pdf, accessed 12 March2017.
        . , 129 - 136
    21. 21)
      • J. Mittra , M. Mastroeni , J. Tait .
        21. Mittra, J., Mastroeni, M., Tait, J.: ‘Engaging with uncertainty and risk in agricultural biotechnology regulation: delivering safety and innovation’. Innogen Institute Report, 2014, http://innogen.ac.uk/downloads/Final-Report_140429.pdf, accessed 12 March2017.
        .
    22. 22)
      • J. Adams . (2005)
        22. Adams, J.: ‘Hypermobility: a challenge for governance’. InLyall, C., Tait, J. (Eds): ‘New modes of governance’ (Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2005), pp. 123137.
        .
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • C.R. Sunstein . (2009)
        24. Sunstein, C.R.: ‘Going to extremes: how like minds unite and divide’ (Oxford University Press, 2009).
        .
    25. 25)
      • (2017)
        25. EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, Horizon 2020: ‘Responsible Research and innovation: a cross-cutting issue’. (DG RTD B7-Science with and for Society, 2014, https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/presentation_Galiay.pdf, accessed 12 March2017.
        .
    26. 26)
      • 26. Horizon 2020: ‘Work programme 2016-2017: science with and for society’, (European Commission, 2016) http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-swfs_en.pdf, accessed 12 March2017.
        .
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • M. Kuntz .
        29. Kuntz, M.: ‘Science and postmodernism: from right-thinking to soft despotism’, Trends Biotechnol., 2017, TIBTEC 1470, doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.02.006.
        . Trends Biotechnol.
    30. 30)
      • A. Stirling .
        30. Stirling, A.: ‘Intolerance: retain healthy scepticism’, Nature, 2016, 471, p. 4458.
        . Nature , 4458
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
      • 33. TSB: ‘Responsible innovation framework for commercialisation of research findings’, TSB, 2012, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130221185318/www.innovateuk.org/_assets/responsible_innovation.pdf, accessed 12 March2017.
        .
    34. 34)
      • 34. EPSRC: ‘Anticipate, reflect, engage and act (AREA)’, http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/research/framework/area/, accessed 3 March2017.
        .
    35. 35)
    36. 36)
      • J. Tait , G. Banda .
        36. Tait, J., Banda, G.: ‘Proportionate and adaptive governance of innovative technologies: the role of regulations, guidelines and standards’. British Standards Institution, 2016, http://www.bsigroup.com/research-pagit-uk, accessed 12 March2017.
        .
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/enb.2017.0010
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/enb.2017.0010
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address