access icon free Reply to comments on ‘Analysis of collision probabilities for saturated IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol’

The present authors (Kuan and Dimyati) acknowledge the comments of Foh and Tantra in their earlier Letter. In response, they argue that busy-idle conditions had been studied prior to the publication of Foh and Tantra's comments. From their observation, different interpretations of the collision probabilities and busy probabilities are identified as fundamental differences between the two Letters. In addition, both models emphasise different aspects of performance evaluation.

Inspec keywords: access protocols; IEEE standards; wireless LAN

Other keywords: performance evaluation; MAC protocol; IEEE 802.11; collision probabilities analysis

Subjects: Radio links and equipment; Local area networks; Protocols; Computer communications; Protocols

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • Zhao, J., Guo, Z., Zhang, Q., Zhu, W.: `Performance study of MAC for service differentiation in IEEE 802.11', IEEE Conf. on Global Telecommunications, 2002, Taipei, Taiwan, p. 778–782.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • Kuo, W.-K., Kuo, C.-C.J.: `Enhanced backoff scheme in CSMA/CA for IEEE 802.11', IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conf., 2003, Orlando, FL, USA, p. 2809–2813.
    8. 8)
      • Tinirello, I., Bianchi, G.: `Analysis of priority mechanisms based on differentiated inter-frame spacing in CSMA-CA', IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conf., 2003, Orlando, FL, USA, 3, p. 1401–1405.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/el_20070616
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/el_20070616
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
See Also
This article has the following associated article(s):
Comments on the paper ‘Analysis of collision probabilities for saturated IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol’