Analysis of wireless transceiver power tradeoffs for green communications

V. Marojevic; I. Gomez-Miguelez; A. Gelonch-Bosch

Analysis of wireless transceiver power tradeoffs for green communications

View Fulltext

Author(s): V. Marojevic¹ ; I. Gomez-Miguelez² ; A. Gelonch-Bosch³
- Affiliations: 1: Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Wireless @ Virginia Tech , Blacksburg, Virginia , USA ;
  2: Software Radio Systems Limited , Cork, Ireland ;
  3: Department of Signal Theory and Communications, UPC-Barcelona Tech/EETAC , Castelldefels, Barcelona , Spain
Source: Volume 54, Issue 4, 22 February 2018, p. 248 – 250
DOI: 10.1049/el.2017.3476 , Print ISSN 0013-5194, Online ISSN 1350-911X

Received 11/09/2017, Published 08/01/2018

The energy optimisation problem of wireless communications as a power consumption tradeoff between the transmitter and receiver is considered. The goal is finding the right balance between the transmission power and the amount of digital signal processing at the receiver. The problem then consists of deriving the optimal signal-to-noise ratio. Receiver cost functions from real implementations are defined and the constrained optimisation problem for single and multiuser links is solved. The numerical analysis shows that there is an optimal ratio between transmission power and signal processing which can lead to a 30% power reduction for noise limited systems.

References

1. 1)
  - 9. Gomez, I., Marojevic, V., Gelonch, A.: ‘Processing-to-amplifier power ratio for energy efficient communications’, Electron. Lett., 2012, 48, (12), pp. 732–734 (doi: 10.1049/el.2011.3679).
2. 2)
  - 10. Gomez, I., Marojevic, V., Bracke, J., et al: ‘Performance and overhead analysis of ALOE middleware for SDR’. IEEE Military Communications Conf., San Jose, CA, USA, 31 October–3 November 2010, pp. 1134–1139.
3. 3)
  - 8. Naessens, F., Derudder, V., Cappelle, H., et al: ‘A 10.37 mm2 675 mW reconfigurable LDPC and turbo encoder and decoder for 802.11n, 802.16e and 3GPP-LTE’. IEEE Symp. VLSI Circuits (VLSIC), 16–18 June 2010, pp. 213–214.
4. 4)
  - 11. Grover, P., Woyach, K.A., Palaiyanur, H., et al: ‘An interference-aware perspective on decoding power’. 6th Int. Symp. Turbo Codes & Iterative Information Processing, Brest, France, 6–10 September 2010, pp. 457–461.
5. 5)
  - 1. GSMA: ‘Mobile's green manifesto 2012’, White Paper, June 2012.
6. 6)
  - 7. Correia, L., Zeller, D., Blume, O., et al: ‘Challenges and enabling technologies for energy aware mobile radio networks’, IEEE Commun. Mag., 2010, 48, (11), pp. 66–72 (doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2010.5621969).
7. 7)
  - 24. Cui, S., Goldsmith, A., Bahai, A.: ‘Energy-constrained modulation optimization’, IEEE Trans Wirel. Commun., 2005, 4, (5), pp. 2349–2360 (doi: 10.1109/TWC.2005.853882).
8. 8)
  - 12. Marojevic, V., Gomez, I., Gelonch, A.: ‘Cognitive resource management for all wireless access layers’, Veh. Tech. Mag., 2012, 7, (2), pp. 100–106 (doi: 10.1109/MVT.2012.2190190).
9. 9)
  - 6. Gomez-Miguelez, I., Marojevic, V., Gelonch, A.: ‘Energy-efficient water-filling with ordered statistics’, Trans. Veh. Technol., 2014, 63, (1), pp. 428–432 (doi: 10.1109/TVT.2013.2271647).
10. 10)
  - 3. Ge, X., Yang, J., Gharavi, H., et al: ‘Energy efficiency challenges of 5G small cell networks’, Commun. Mag., 2017, 55, (5), pp. 184–191 (doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600788).
11. 11)
  - 2. Miao, G., Himayat, N., Li, G.: ‘Energy-efficient link adaptation in frequency-selective channels’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 2010, 58, (2), pp. 545–554 (doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2010.02.080587).
12. 12)
  - 7. Gomez-Miguelez, I., Marojevic, V., Gelonch, A.: ‘Link adaptation for energy-efficient transmission with receiver CSI’, Commun. Lett., 2012, 16, (9), pp. 1412–1415 (doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2012.072012.120522).

Login

Not registered yet?

Share

Tools

Login to add to favourites

Key

Analysis of wireless transceiver power tradeoffs for green communications

References

Related content