Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Tackling OpenFlow power hog in core networks with KeyFlow

A comprehensive data plane power consumption analysis of an OpenFlow 1.0 switch broken down into its design modules is presented, and KeyFlow as an alternative solution is proposed, since it eliminates a flow table lookup by reducing 53.7% of the overall power consumption.

References

    1. 1)
      • 4. Saldaña, S., et al: ‘Power-aware multi-layer translucent network’. Proc. OFC, W2A.53, San Francisco, CA, USA, March 2014.
    2. 2)
      • 3. Vishmanath, A., et al: ‘Adapting router buffers for energy efficiency’. CoNEXT, New York, NY, USA, March 2011, p. 19.
    3. 3)
      • 2. Marconett, D., et al: ‘Optical FlowBroker: load-balancing in software-defined multi-domain optical networks’. Proc. OFC, W1 K.3, San Francisco, CA, USA, March 2014.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 6. Kannan, K., et al: ‘Compact TCAM for power aware SDN’, ICDCN, 2013, 7730, pp. 429443.
    6. 6)
      • 11. Jiang, W., et al: ‘Scalable Ternary Content Addressable Memory Implementation using NetFPGAs’ (ANCS, 2013).
    7. 7)
      • 9. Naous, J., et al: ‘Implementing an OpenFlow switch on the NetFPGA platform’. Proc. ANCS, New York, NY, USA, December 2008.
    8. 8)
      • 1. Iovanna, P., et al: ‘E2E traffic engineering routing for transport SDN’. Proc. OFC, W1 K.3, San Francisco, CA, USA, March 2014.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 7. Zerbini, C., et al: ‘Performance evaluation of packet classification on FPGA-based TCAM emulation architectures’. GLOBECOM, Anaheim, CA, USA, December 2012.
    11. 11)
      • 10. Rijmen, V.: ‘Efficient Implementation of the Rijndael S-box’ (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of ESAT, Belgium, 2000).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/el.2014.2346
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/el.2014.2346
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address