Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Correlation study of video object trackers evaluation metrics

A correlation study of a set of video object trackers evaluation metrics is presented. There are multiple metrics in the state-of-the-art, and the main differences between them are based on the penalties that are attributed to the errors (false positives, false negatives, target loss etc.). After defining each one of the considered metrics, a correlation study is presented showing the redundancy between all the metrics. This reported study was performed using multiple tracking algorithms, and an extensive set of video sequences that attempt to cover many different situations.

References

    1. 1)
      • 11. Chu, D.M., Smeulders, A.W.M.: ‘Thirteen hard cases in visual tracking’. Proc. Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, Washington, DC, USA, August 2010, pp. 103110.
    2. 2)
      • 13. Yin, F., Makris, D., Velastin, S.A.: ‘Performance evaluation of object tracking algorithms’. Proc. Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, October 2007.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 1. Brunelli, R.: ‘Template matching techniques in computer vision: theory and practice’ (Wiley Publishing, 2009).
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 9. Lozano, M.: ‘Evaluación comparativa de algoritmos de seguimiento de objetos (tracking)’. Master's thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 2012.
    13. 13)
      • 12. Nawaz, T., Cavallaro, A.: ‘Pft: a protocol for evaluating video trackers’. Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing, Hong Kong, China, September 2011, pp. 23252328.
    14. 14)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/el.2013.3209
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/el.2013.3209
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address