Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Rigid image registration via column sparse optimisation for seal registration

Image registration is an essential and important process in seal identification. Rigid image registration in seal identification is known to be more suitable than elastic registration. The registration process is quite sensitive to outliers in matched feature point pairs. A novel method to take the matching outliers as data corrupted by ‘sample-specific’ error which can be modelled by a column sparse matrix is proposed. An optimisation problem is developed to describe this model. By solving the optimisation problem, corruption can be eliminated and the transformation model can be recovered simultaneously. An efficient algorithm called column sparse registration is given via the augmented Lagrange multiplier method. Experiments on real-world seal registration data demonstrate that the proposed method is robust to outliers among matched pairs and outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.

References

    1. 1)
      • 2. Fischer, B., Modersitzki, J.: ‘Ill-posed medicine – an introduction to image registration’, Inverse Probl., 2008, 24, (3), p. 034008 (doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/24/3/034008).
    2. 2)
      • 7. Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., Gool, L.: ‘Speeded-up robust features (SURF)’, Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 2008, 110, pp. 346359 (doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014).
    3. 3)
      • 8. Liu, G., Lin, Z., Yan, S., Sun, J., Yu, Y., Ma, Y.: ‘Robust recovery of subspace structures by low-rank representation’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal., 2013, 35, (1), pp. 171184 (doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.88).
    4. 4)
      • 9. I. CVX Research: ‘CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.0 beta’, 2012. Available at http://cvxr.com/cvx.
    5. 5)
      • 6. Hampel, F.: ‘Robust statistics: The approach based on influence functions’ (Wiley, 1986).
    6. 6)
      • 4. Fischler, M., Bolles, R.: ‘Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography’, Commun. ACM, 1981, 24, pp. 381395 (doi: 10.1145/358669.358692).
    7. 7)
      • 5. Torr, P., Murray, D.: ‘The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix’, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 1997, 24, pp. 271300 (doi: 10.1023/A:1007927408552).
    8. 8)
      • 1. Zitova, B., Flusser, J.: ‘Image registration methods: a survey’, Image Vis. Comput., 2003, 21, pp. 9771000 (doi: 10.1016/S0262-8856(03)00137-9).
    9. 9)
      • 10. Grant, M., Boyd, S.: ‘Graph implementations for nonsmooth convex programs’, Recent Advances in Learning and Control, 2008, pp. 95110. Springer-Verlag Limited. Available at http://stanford.edu/boyd/graph_dcp.html.
    10. 10)
      • 3. Yi, Z., Zhiguo, C., Yang, X.: ‘Multi-spectral remote image registration based on SIFT’, Electron. Lett., 2008, 44, (2), pp. 107108 (doi: 10.1049/el:20082477).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/el.2013.0835
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/el.2013.0835
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address