Comparison of Optimized Pulse Patterns with Direct Model Predictive Control Using Co-Simulation
Comparison of Optimized Pulse Patterns with Direct Model Predictive Control Using Co-Simulation
- Author(s): C. Schulte ; K. Peter ; M. Leuer ; J. Bocker
- DOI: 10.1049/cp.2016.0331
For access to this article, please select a purchase option:
Buy conference paper PDF
Buy Knowledge Pack
IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.
8th IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2016) — Recommend this title to your library
Thank you
Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.
- Author(s): C. Schulte ; K. Peter ; M. Leuer ; J. Bocker Source: 8th IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2016), 2016 page ()
- Conference: 8th IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2016)
- DOI: 10.1049/cp.2016.0331
- ISBN: 978-1-78561-188-9
- Location: Glasgow, UK
- Conference date: 19-21 April 2016
- Format: PDF
Accurate simulation of electric drives has always been desirable, as it allows the machine designer a deeper insight into the whole design. This publication presents a comparison of two different control approaches. To maximize the results' accuracy, no reduced-order models of the control structure or of the motor model are being used. The comparison includes a PI-controller with optimized pulse patterns and a Direct Model Predictive Control. As a benchmark the current response and the magnet loss are compared. The comparison of both control strategies shows that the Model Predictive Control offers high dynamics buts leading to higher magnet loss compared with the optimized pulse patterns. The simulated magnet loss values of the optimized pulse patterns correlates well with the results of the analytical approach.
Inspec keywords: eddy current losses; machine control; electric drives; PI control; predictive control; magnetic leakage; control engineering computing; electric machine analysis computing
Subjects: Optimal control; Control engineering computing; Drives; Power engineering computing; Control of electric power systems
Related content
content/conferences/10.1049/cp.2016.0331
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6