Comparing classifier effectiveness

Access Full Text

Comparing classifier effectiveness

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy chapter PDF
£10.00
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 chapters for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
Radar Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) and Non-Cooperative Target Recognition (NCTR) — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Author(s): Joachim Schiller  and  Karlhans Rosenbach
Source: Radar Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) and Non-Cooperative Target Recognition (NCTR),2013
Publication date September 2013

The classification and even, if possible, identification of any object or target under observation unambiguously at a distance and in such short times that a decision and an `adapted' reaction are possible was, is and will be a most important task in the military and also security domains. There is an ongoing effort in many countries all over the world, and of course also in NATO, to improve the existing solutions. One approach, the obvious one, is the idea to allow any object entering observed areas to identify itself actively on request. Such systems have been installed for many years in the military domain and are called `Q&A' systems or `identification friend or foe' (IFF) systems. For air targets, and if radar is used as the sensor system, aircraft have been equipped for many years with systems like Mark X or Mark XII in different modes which were able to answer an interrogating pulse from the observer with a predefined code revealing, in addition to other information, its identity. Systems like that are also used in the civilian air traffic control (ATC) and because they support the interrogator they are called `cooperative identification systems'. However, they show some important drawbacks.

Chapter Contents:

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 NCTI studies
  • 6.3 Measurements
  • 6.3.1 TIRA system
  • 6.3.2 Targets
  • 6.4 Idea of classification
  • 6.4.1 Appropriate features
  • 6.4.2 HRR and 2D ISAR
  • 6.4.3 2D ISAR template correlation classifier
  • 6.4.4 Selection of radar parameters
  • 6.5 Classification scheme
  • 6.5.1 Pre-processing unit
  • 6.5.2 Feature extraction/reduction
  • 6.5.3 Choosing a classifier
  • 6.5.4 Test of classifiers
  • 6.6 Feature extraction
  • 6.6.1 Classification results using different feature sets
  • 6.7 Conclusion
  • References

Inspec keywords: military aircraft; target tracking; radar imaging; radar detection; object detection; military radar

Other keywords: NATO; air targets; Mark XII; interrogator; interrogating pulse; IFF systems; military domain; target identification; ATC; identification friend or foe systems; object identification; radar; Q&A systems; security domains; cooperative identification systems; classifier effectiveness; civilian air traffic control

Subjects: Optical, image and video signal processing; Radar equipment, systems and applications; Signal detection; Transportation (military and defence); Radar and radiowave systems (military and defence)

Preview this chapter:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Comparing classifier effectiveness, Page 1 of 2

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/books/ra/pbra033e/PBRA033E_ch6-1.gif /docserver/preview/fulltext/books/ra/pbra033e/PBRA033E_ch6-2.gif

Related content

content/books/10.1049/pbra033e_ch6
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading